Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lucas Gnecco Heredia

dblp:325/5719 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 44% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 44% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.712023
On the Role of Randomization in Adversarially Robust Classification · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
probabilistic classifier
0.712023
On the Role of Randomization in Adversarially Robust Classification · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › model ensemble
stochastic ensembles
0.212023
On the Role of Randomization in Adversarially Robust Classification · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

randomized ensemble · 0.7noise injection · 0.7adversarial risk · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Unveiling the Role of Randomization in Multiclass Adversarial Classification: Insights from Graph Theory
abstract
Randomization as a mean to improve the adversarial robustness of machine learning models has recently attracted significant attention. Unfortunately, much of the theoretical analysis so far has focused on binary classification, providing only limited insights into the more complex multiclass setting. In this paper, we take a step toward closing this gap by drawing inspiration from the field of graph theory. Our analysis focuses on discrete data distributions, allowing us to cast the adversarial risk minimization problems within the well-established framework of set packing problems. By doing so, we are able to identify three structural conditions on the support of the data distribution that are necessary for randomization to improve robustness. Furthermore, we are able to construct several data distributions where (contrarily to binary classification) switching from a deterministic to a randomized solution significantly reduces the optimal adversarial risk. These findings highlight the crucial role randomization can play in enhancing robustness to adversarial attacks in multiclass classification.
Lucas Gnecco Heredia, Matteo Sammut, Muni Sreenivas Pydi, Rafael Pinot, Benjamin Négrevergne, Yann Chevaleyre
AISTATS1
2025 Lattice Climber Attack: Adversarial Attacks for Randomized Mixtures of Classifiers
Lucas Gnecco Heredia, Benjamin Négrevergne, Yann Chevaleyre
ECML/PKDD (7)1
2023 On the Role of Randomization in Adversarially Robust Classification
abstract
Deep neural networks are known to be vulnerable to small adversarial perturbations in test data. To defend against adversarial attacks, probabilistic classifiers have been proposed as an alternative to deterministic ones. However, literature has conflicting findings on the effectiveness of probabilistic classifiers in comparison to deterministic ones. In this paper, we clarify the role of randomization in building adversarially robust classifiers. Given a base hypothesis set of deterministic classifiers, we show the conditions under which a randomized ensemble outperforms the hypothesis set in adversarial risk, extending previous results. Additionally, we show that for any probabilistic binary classifier (including randomized ensembles), there exists a deterministic classifier that outperforms it. Finally, we give an explicit description of the deterministic hypothesis set that contains such a deterministic classifier for many types of commonly used probabilistic classifiers, *i.e.* randomized ensembles and parametric/input noise injection.
Lucas Gnecco Heredia, Muni Sreenivas Pydi, Laurent Meunier, Benjamin Négrevergne, Yann Chevaleyre
NeurIPS1