Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nitya Sathyavageeswaran

dblp:326/0280 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 33% Multi-agent systems · 33% Learning theory · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
classification
0.912025
Learning to Help in Multi-Class Settings · ICLR 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › human-agent interaction › human-AI decision making
learning to defer
0.912025
Learning to Help in Multi-Class Settings · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › inference efficiency
resource-constrained inference
0.912025
Learning to Help in Multi-Class Settings · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

surrogate loss · 0.9bayes-consistent loss · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Learning to Help in Multi-Class Settings
abstract
Deploying complex machine learning models on resource-constrained devices is challenging due to limited computational power, memory, and model retrainability. To address these limitations, a hybrid system can be established by augmenting the local model with a server-side model, where samples are selectively deferred by a *rejector* and then sent to the server for processing. The hybrid system enables efficient use of computational resources while minimizing the overhead associated with server usage. The recently proposed Learning to Help (L2H) model proposed training a server model given a fixed local (client) model. This differs from the Learning to Defer (L2D) framework which trains the client for a fixed (expert) server. In both L2D and L2H, the training includes learning a rejector at the client to determine when to query the server. In this work, we extend the L2H model from binary to multi-class classification problems and demonstrate its applicability in a number of different scenarios of practical interest in which access to the server may be limited by cost, availability, or policy. We derive a stage-switching surrogate loss function that is differentiable, convex, and consistent with the Bayes rule corresponding to the 0-1 loss for the L2H model. Experiments show that our proposed methods offer an efficient and practical solution for multi-class classification in resource-constrained environments.
Yu Wu 0020, Zeyu Dong, Nitya Sathyavageeswaran, Anand D. Sarwate
ICLR4
2024 Timely Offloading in Mobile Edge Cloud Systems
abstract
Future real-time applications like smart cities will use complex Machine Learning (ML) models for a variety of tasks. Timely status information is required for these applications to be reliable. Offloading computation to a mobile edge cloud (MEC) can reduce the completion time of these tasks. However, using the MEC may come at a cost such as related to use of a cloud service or privacy. In this paper, we consider a source that generates time-stamped status updates for delivery to a monitor after processing by the mobile device or MEC. We study how a scheduler must forward these updates to achieve timely updates at the monitor but also limit MEC usage. We measure timeliness at the monitor using the age of information (AoI) metric. We formulate this problem as an infinite horizon Markov decision process (MDP) with an average cost criterion. We prove that an optimal scheduling policy has an age-threshold structure that depends on how long an update has been in service.
Nitya Sathyavageeswaran, Roy D. Yates, Anand D. Sarwate, Narayan Mandayam Rutgers
ITW1
2022 Privacy Leakage in Discrete-Time Updating Systems
abstract
A source generates time-stamped update packets that are sent to a server and then forwarded to a monitor. This occurs in the presence of an adversary that can infer information about the source by observing the output process of the server. The server wishes to release updates in a timely way to the monitor but also wishes to minimize the information leaked to the adversary. We analyze the trade-off between the age of information (AoI) and the maximal leakage for systems in which the source generates updates as a Bernoulli process. For a time slotted system in which sending an update requires one slot, we consider three server policies: (1) Memoryless with Bernoulli Thinning (MBT): arriving updates are queued with some probability and head-of-line update is released after a geometric holding time; (2) Deterministic Accumulate-and-Dump (DAD): the most recently generated update (if any) is released after a fixed time; (3) Random Accumulate-and-Dump (RAD): the most recently generated update (if any) is released after a geometric waiting time. We show that for the same maximal leakage rate, the DAD policy achieves lower age compared to the other two policies but is restricted to discrete age-leakage operating points.
Nitya Sathyavageeswaran, Roy D. Yates, Anand D. Sarwate, Narayan B. Mandayam
ISIT1