Minimizing the weighted completion times ($P \mid \mid Σw_j C_j$) and weighted number of tardy jobs ($P \mid \mid Σw_j U_j$) on multiple identical machines are two classical NP-hard scheduling problems. As shown by Lenté et al. (2014), both problems can be solved in time ${O}^{\star}(3^n)$. In this paper, we improve these bounds to ${O}(2.755^n)$ and ${O}^{\star}(2^n)$, respectively. Our algorithm for $P \mid \mid Σw_j C_j$ exploits the meet-in-the-middle paradigm and an efficient data structure answering linear programming queries. Additionally, when the number of machines is at most $6$, we show that the running time for $P \mid \mid Σw_j C_j$ can further be improved. Both scheduling problems are generalizations of the classical Bin Packing problem, which can be solved in ${O}^{\star}(2^n)$ time. Improving this running time is an important open question. We show that, when assuming the Asymptotic Rank Conjecture (ARC), Bin Packing can be solved in time ${O}((2-\varepsilon)^n)$ for some $\varepsilon >0$. Our algorithm makes use of two main ingredients: the recent ${O}((2-\varepsilon)^n)$-time algorithm of Nederlof et al. [SICOMP'23] for Bin Packing when the number of bins is a fixed constant, and the ${O}((2-\varepsilon)^n)$-time algorithm of Björklund et al. [SODA'25] for special instances of the $3$-way Partitioning problem when assuming ARC.

Bin Packing with k bins is a fundamental optimisation problem in which we are given a set of n integers and a capacity T and the goal is to partition the set into k subsets, each of total sum at most T. Bin Packing is NP-hard already for k=2 and a textbook dynamic programming algorithm solves it in pseudopolynomial time O(n Tk−1). Jansen, Kratsch, Marx, and Schlotter [JCSS’13] proved that this time cannot be improved to (nT)o(k / logk) assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH). Their result has become an important building block, explaining the hardness of many problems in parameterised complexity. Note that their result is one log-factor short of being tight. In this paper, we prove a tight ETH-based lower bound for Bin Packing, ruling out time 2o(n) To(k). This answers an open problem of Jansen et al. and yields improved lower bounds for many applications in parameterised complexity.

We present a pseudopolynomial-time algorithm for the Knapsack problem that has running time $\widetilde{O}(n + t\sqrt{p_{\max}})$, where $n$ is the number of items, $t$ is the knapsack capacity, and $p_{\max}$ is the maximum item profit. This improves over the $\widetilde{O}(n + t \, p_{\max})$-time algorithm based on the convolution and prediction technique by Bateni et al.~(STOC 2018). Moreover, we give some evidence, based on a strengthening of the Min-Plus Convolution Hypothesis, that our running time might be optimal. Our algorithm uses two new technical tools, which might be of independent interest. First, we generalize the $\widetilde{O}(n^{1.5})$-time algorithm for bounded monotone min-plus convolution by Chi et al.~(STOC 2022) to the \emph{rectangular} case where the range of entries can be different from the sequence length. Second, we give a reduction from general knapsack instances to \emph{balanced} instances, where all items have nearly the same profit-to-weight ratio, up to a constant factor. Using these techniques, we can also obtain algorithms that run in time $\widetilde{O}(n + OPT\sqrt{w_{\max}})$, $\widetilde{O}(n + (nw_{\max}p_{\max})^{1/3}t^{2/3})$, and $\widetilde{O}(n + (nw_{\max}p_{\max})^{1/3} OPT^{2/3})$, where $OPT$ is the optimal total profit and $w_{\max}$ is the maximum item weight.

In 1982 Papadimitriou and Yannakakis introduced the Exact Matching problem, in which given a red and blue edge-colored graph $G$ and an integer $k$ one has to decide whether there exists a perfect matching in $G$ with exactly $k$ red edges. Even though a randomized polynomial-time algorithm for this problem was quickly found a few years later, it is still unknown today whether a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm exists. This makes the Exact Matching problem an important candidate to test the RP=P hypothesis. In this paper we focus on approximating Exact Matching. While there exists a simple algorithm that computes in deterministic polynomial-time an almost perfect matching with exactly $k$ red edges, not a lot of work focuses on computing perfect matchings with almost $k$ red edges. In fact such an algorithm for bipartite graphs running in deterministic polynomial-time was published only recently (STACS'23). It outputs a perfect matching with $k'$ red edges with the guarantee that $0.5k \leq k' \leq 1.5k$. In the present paper we aim at approximating the number of red edges without exceeding the limit of $k$ red edges. We construct a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm, which on bipartite graphs computes a perfect matching with $k'$ red edges such that $k/3 \leq k' \leq k$.

In a recent breakthrough paper, Chi et al. (STOC'22) introduce an O˜(n3+ω2) time algorithm to compute Monotone Min-Plus Product between two square matrices of dimensions n×n and polynomial bounded values. This greatly improves upon the previous O˜(n12+ω5) time algorithm and as a consequence improves bounds for its applications. Several other applications involve Monotone Min-Plus Product between rectangular matrices, and even if Chi et al.'s algorithm seems applicable for the rectangular case, the generalization is not straightforward. In this paper we present a generalization of the algorithm of Chi et al. to solve Monotone Min-Plus Product for rectangular matrices with polynomial bounded values. We next use this faster algorithm to improve running times for the following applications of Rectangular Monotone Min-Plus Product: M-bounded Single Source Replacement Path, Batch Range Mode, k-Dyck Edit Distance and 2-approximation of All Pairs Shortest Path. We also improve the running time for Unweighted Tree Edit Distance using the algorithm by Chi et al..