Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Simon Dold 0001

dblp:326/2080-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-5332-8251ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 73% Trustworthy machine learning · 13% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 13%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational complexity · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
classical planning
1.622025
Pseudo-Boolean Proof Logging for Optimal Classical Planning · ICAPS 2025
Higher-Dimensional Potential Heuristics: Lower Bound Criterion and Connection to Correlation Complexity · ICAPS 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
automated reasoning and model checking
0.912025
Pseudo-Boolean Proof Logging for Optimal Classical Planning · ICAPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
certified lower bound
0.912025
Pseudo-Boolean Proof Logging for Optimal Classical Planning · ICAPS 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning › plan optimization
optimal planning
0.912025
Pseudo-Boolean Proof Logging for Optimal Classical Planning · ICAPS 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
heuristic search
0.812024
Novelty vs. Potential Heuristics: A Comparison of Hardness Measures for Satisficing Planning · AAAI 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › heuristic search › admissible heuristics
potential heuristics
0.812024
Higher-Dimensional Potential Heuristics: Lower Bound Criterion and Connection to Correlation Complexity · ICAPS 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › classical planning
satisficing planning
0.812024
Novelty vs. Potential Heuristics: A Comparison of Hardness Measures for Satisficing Planning · AAAI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

potential heuristics · 1.5novelty width · 1.5correlation complexity · 1.5pseudo-boolean constraints · 0.9pattern database heuristics · 0.9hmax · 0.9a* · 0.9correlation complexity analysis · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 End-to-End Certified Graph Colouring
abstract
Applied combinatorial optimization has witnessed a revolution in performance since the turn of the millennium, but the complexity of modern solvers is making bugs an ever more serious concern. The most promising remedy is to make solvers certifying, so that they use proof logging to generate machine-verifiable proofs of correctness. We present the first example of state-of-the-art certified graph colouring by equipping the solver ZykovColor with VeriPB proof logging. Combined with the formally verified CakePB checker, this provides end-to-end formally certified results. An experimental evaluation shows excellent results with only moderate overhead for proof logging and checking.
Simon Dold 0001, George Katsirelos, Wietze Koops, Magnus O. Myreen, Jakob Nordström, Andy Oertel, Yong Kiam Tan
CP1
2025 Pseudo-Boolean Proof Logging for Optimal Classical Planning
abstract
We introduce lower-bound certificates for classical planning tasks, which can be used to prove the unsolvability of a task or the optimality of a plan in a way that can be verified by an independent third party. We describe a general framework for generating lower-bound certificates based on pseudo-Boolean constraints, which is agnostic to the planning algorithm used. As a case study, we show how to modify the A* algorithm to produce proofs of optimality with modest overhead, using pattern database heuristics and hmax as concrete examples. The same proof logging approach works for any heuristic whose inferences can be efficiently expressed as reasoning over pseudo-Boolean constraints.
Simon Dold 0001, Malte Helmert, Jakob Nordström, Gabriele Röger, Tanja Schindler
ICAPS1
2024 Novelty vs. Potential Heuristics: A Comparison of Hardness Measures for Satisficing Planning
abstract
Classical planning considers a given task and searches for a plan to solve it. Some tasks are harder to solve than others. We can measure the 'hardness' of a task with the novelty width and the correlation complexity. In this work, we compare these measures. Additionally, we introduce the river measure, a new measure that is based on potential heuristics and therefore similar to the correlation complexity but also comparable to the novelty width. We show that the river measure is upper bounded by the correlation complexity and by the novelty width +1. Furthermore, we show that we can convert a planning task with a polynomial blowup of the task size to ensure that a heuristic of dimension 2 exists that gives rise to backtrack-free search.
Simon Dold 0001, Malte Helmert
AAAI1
2024 Higher-Dimensional Potential Heuristics: Lower Bound Criterion and Connection to Correlation Complexity
abstract
Correlation complexity is a measure of a planning task indicating how hard it is. The introducing work, provides sufficient criteria to detect a correlation complexity of 2 on a planning task. It also introduced an example of a planning task with correlation complexity 3. In our work, we introduce a criterion to detect an arbitrary correlation complexity and extend the mentioned example to show with the new criterion that planning tasks with arbitrary correlation complexity exist.
Simon Dold 0001, Malte Helmert
ICAPS1