Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shaleen Kumar Gupta

dblp:326/3702 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0006-1130-5725ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › retrieval models › sparse retrieval
learned sparse retrieval
0.712023
End-to-End Query Term Weighting · KDD 2023
Information retrieval › retrieval models
lexical retrieval
0.712023
End-to-End Query Term Weighting · KDD 2023
Information retrieval › retrieval models › term weighting
query term weighting
0.712023
End-to-End Query Term Weighting · KDD 2023
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.712023
End-to-End Query Term Weighting · KDD 2023
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
dense retrieval
0.612022
Multi-Aspect Dense Retrieval · KDD 2022
Information retrieval
e-commerce search
0.212022
Multi-Aspect Dense Retrieval · KDD 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ranking loss · 0.7BERT · 0.7aspect prediction · 0.6aspect embeddings · 0.6approximate nearest neighbor search · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 End-to-End Query Term Weighting
abstract
Bag-of-words based lexical retrieval systems are still the most commonly used methods for real-world search applications. Recently deep learning methods have shown promising results to improve this retrieval performance but are expensive to run in an online fashion, non-trivial to integrate into existing production systems, and might not generalize well in out-of-domain retrieval scenarios. Instead, we build on top of lexical retrievers by proposing a Term Weighting BERT (TW-BERT) model. TW-BERT learns to predict the weight for individual n-gram (e.g., uni-grams and bi-grams) query input terms. These inferred weights and terms can be used directly by a retrieval system to perform a query search. To optimize these term weights, TW-BERT incorporates the scoring function used by the search engine, such as BM25, to score query-document pairs. Given sample query-document pairs we can compute a ranking loss over these matching scores, optimizing the learned query term weights in an end-to-end fashion. Aligning TW-BERT with search engine scorers minimizes the changes needed to integrate it into existing production applications, whereas existing deep learning based search methods would require further infrastructure optimization and hardware requirements. The learned weights can be easily utilized by standard lexical retrievers and by other retrieval techniques such as query expansion. We show that TW-BERT improves retrieval performance over strong term weighting baselines within MSMARCO and in out-of-domain retrieval on TREC datasets.
Karan Samel, Cheng Li 0012, Weize Kong, Tao Chen 0008, Mingyang Zhang 0001, Shaleen Kumar Gupta, Swaraj Khadanga, Wensong Xu, Kashyap Kolipaka, Michael Bendersky, Marc Najork
KDD6
2022 Multi-Aspect Dense Retrieval
abstract
Prior work in Dense Retrieval usually encodes queries and documents using single-vector representations (also called embeddings) and performs retrieval in the embedding space using approximate nearest neighbor search. This paradigm enables efficient semantic retrieval. However, the single-vector representations can be ineffective at capturing different aspects of the queries and documents in relevance matching, especially for some vertical domains. For example, in e-commerce search, these aspects could be category, brand and color. Given a query ''white nike socks", a Dense Retrieval model may mistakenly retrieve some ''white adidas socks" while missing out the intended brand. We propose to explicitly represent multiple aspects using one embedding per aspect. We introduce an aspect prediction task to teach the model to capture aspect information with particular aspect embeddings. We design a lightweight network to fuse the aspect embeddings for representing queries and documents. Our evaluation using an e-commerce dataset shows impressive improvements over strong Dense Retrieval baselines. We also discover that the proposed aspect embeddings can enhance the interpretability of Dense Retrieval models as a byproduct.
Weize Kong, Swaraj Khadanga, Cheng Li 0012, Shaleen Kumar Gupta, Mingyang Zhang 0001, Wensong Xu, Michael Bendersky
KDD4