Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shaleen Kumar Gupta
dblp:326/3702
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0006-1130-5725ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › retrieval models › sparse retrieval
learned sparse retrieval |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | End-to-End Query Term Weighting · KDD 2023 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models
lexical retrieval |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | End-to-End Query Term Weighting · KDD 2023 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models › term weighting
query term weighting |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | End-to-End Query Term Weighting · KDD 2023 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | End-to-End Query Term Weighting · KDD 2023 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
dense retrieval |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Multi-Aspect Dense Retrieval · KDD 2022 |
Information retrieval
e-commerce search |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Multi-Aspect Dense Retrieval · KDD 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
ranking loss · 0.7BERT · 0.7aspect prediction · 0.6aspect embeddings · 0.6approximate nearest neighbor search · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | End-to-End Query Term WeightingabstractBag-of-words based lexical retrieval systems are still the most commonly used methods for real-world search applications. Recently deep learning methods have shown promising results to improve this retrieval performance but are expensive to run in an online fashion, non-trivial to integrate into existing production systems, and might not generalize well in out-of-domain retrieval scenarios. Instead, we build on top of lexical retrievers by proposing a Term Weighting BERT (TW-BERT) model. TW-BERT learns to predict the weight for individual n-gram (e.g., uni-grams and bi-grams) query input terms. These inferred weights and terms can be used directly by a retrieval system to perform a query search. To optimize these term weights, TW-BERT incorporates the scoring function used by the search engine, such as BM25, to score query-document pairs. Given sample query-document pairs we can compute a ranking loss over these matching scores, optimizing the learned query term weights in an end-to-end fashion. Aligning TW-BERT with search engine scorers minimizes the changes needed to integrate it into existing production applications, whereas existing deep learning based search methods would require further infrastructure optimization and hardware requirements. The learned weights can be easily utilized by standard lexical retrievers and by other retrieval techniques such as query expansion. We show that TW-BERT improves retrieval performance over strong term weighting baselines within MSMARCO and in out-of-domain retrieval on TREC datasets. Karan Samel, Cheng Li 0012, Weize Kong, Tao Chen 0008, Mingyang Zhang 0001, Shaleen Kumar Gupta, Swaraj Khadanga, Wensong Xu, Kashyap Kolipaka, Michael Bendersky, Marc Najork |
KDD | 6 |
| 2022 | Multi-Aspect Dense RetrievalabstractPrior work in Dense Retrieval usually encodes queries and documents using single-vector representations (also called embeddings) and performs retrieval in the embedding space using approximate nearest neighbor search. This paradigm enables efficient semantic retrieval. However, the single-vector representations can be ineffective at capturing different aspects of the queries and documents in relevance matching, especially for some vertical domains. For example, in e-commerce search, these aspects could be category, brand and color. Given a query ''white nike socks", a Dense Retrieval model may mistakenly retrieve some ''white adidas socks" while missing out the intended brand. We propose to explicitly represent multiple aspects using one embedding per aspect. We introduce an aspect prediction task to teach the model to capture aspect information with particular aspect embeddings. We design a lightweight network to fuse the aspect embeddings for representing queries and documents. Our evaluation using an e-commerce dataset shows impressive improvements over strong Dense Retrieval baselines. We also discover that the proposed aspect embeddings can enhance the interpretability of Dense Retrieval models as a byproduct. Weize Kong, Swaraj Khadanga, Cheng Li 0012, Shaleen Kumar Gupta, Mingyang Zhang 0001, Wensong Xu, Michael Bendersky |
KDD | 4 |