Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ankith M. S

dblp:326/3786 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-3776-0607ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
e-commerce search
0.712023
Beyond Hard Negatives in Product Search: Semantic Matching Using One-Class Classification (SMOCC) · WSDM 2023
Information retrieval
semantic matching
0.712023
Beyond Hard Negatives in Product Search: Semantic Matching Using One-Class Classification (SMOCC) · WSDM 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › adaptive computation
early exit
0.612022
BE3R: BERT based Early-Exit Using Expert Routing · KDD 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency
0.612022
BE3R: BERT based Early-Exit Using Expert Routing · KDD 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.612022
BE3R: BERT based Early-Exit Using Expert Routing · KDD 2022
Information retrieval › ranking
search relevance
0.212022
BE3R: BERT based Early-Exit Using Expert Routing · KDD 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

expert routing · 1.1BERT · 1.1one-class classification · 0.7hard negative mining · 0.7contrastive learning · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Beyond Hard Negatives in Product Search: Semantic Matching Using One-Class Classification (SMOCC)
abstract
Semantic matching is an important component of a product search pipeline. Its goal is to capture the semantic intent of the search query as opposed to the syntactic matching performed by a lexical matching system. A semantic matching model captures relationships like synonyms, and also captures common behavioral patterns to retrieve relevant results by generalizing from purchase data. They however suffer from lack of availability of informative negative examples for model training. Various methods have been proposed in the past to address this issue based upon hard-negative mining and contrastive learning.
Arindam Bhattacharya, Ankit Gandhi, Vijay Huddar, Ankith M. S, Aayush Moroney, Atul Saroop, Rahul Bhagat
WSDM4
2022 BE3R: BERT based Early-Exit Using Expert Routing
abstract
Pre-trained language models like BERT have reported state-of-the-art performance on several Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, but high computational demands hinder its widespread adoption for large scale NLP tasks. In this work, we propose a novel routing based early exit model called BE3R (BERT based Early-Exit using Expert Routing), where we learn to dynamically exit in the earlier layers without needing to traverse through the entire model. Unlike the exiting early-exit methods, our approach can be extended to a batch inference setting. We consider the specific application of search relevance filtering in Amazon India marketplace services (a large e-commerce website). Our experimental results show that BE3R improves the batch inference throughput by 46.5% over the BERT-Base model and 35.89% over the DistilBERT-Base model on large dataset with 50 Million samples without any trade-off on the performance metric. We conduct thorough experimentation using various architectural choices, loss functions and perform qualitative analysis. We perform experiments on public GLUE Benchmark and demonstrate comparable performance to corresponding baseline models with 23% average throughput improvement across tasks in batch inference setting.
Sourab Mangrulkar, Ankith M. S, Vivek Sembium
KDD2