EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lesi Chen
dblp:326/5433
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
9as first author
12since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0006-8213-2294ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 12 · 9 first-author · 12 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
10 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 30 heaviest of 32, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
2.5 | 3 | 2026 | Faster Newton Methods for Convex and Nonconvex Optimization in Gradient Complexity · COLT 2026 Functionally Constrained Algorithm Solves Convex Simple Bilevel Problem · NeurIPS 2024 Decentralized Convex Finite-Sum Optimization with Better Dependence on Condition Numbers · ICML 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
bilevel optimization |
2.4 | 3 | 2025 | Near-Optimal Nonconvex-Strongly-Convex Bilevel Optimization with Fully First-Order Oracles · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 Functionally Constrained Algorithm Solves Convex Simple Bilevel Problem · NeurIPS 2024 On Finding Small Hyper-Gradients in Bilevel Optimization: Hardness Results and Improved Analysis · COLT 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization |
2.3 | 3 | 2026 | Faster Newton Methods for Convex and Nonconvex Optimization in Gradient Complexity · COLT 2026 Near-Optimal Algorithms for Making the Gradient Small in Stochastic Minimax Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 Faster Stochastic Algorithms for Minimax Optimization under Polyak-{\L}ojasiewicz Condition · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
minimax optimization |
2.2 | 3 | 2025 | Second-Order Min-Max Optimization with Lazy Hessians · ICLR 2025 Near-Optimal Algorithms for Making the Gradient Small in Stochastic Minimax Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 Faster Stochastic Algorithms for Minimax Optimization under Polyak-{\L}ojasiewicz Condition · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › minimax optimization
convex-concave optimization |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Second-Order Min-Max Optimization with Lazy Hessians · ICLR 2025 Solving Convex-Concave Problems with 풪(ε-4/7) Second-Order Oracle Complexity · COLT 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
first-order methods |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Near-Optimal Nonconvex-Strongly-Convex Bilevel Optimization with Fully First-Order Oracles · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 Functionally Constrained Algorithm Solves Convex Simple Bilevel Problem · NeurIPS 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › numerical computation › numerical optimization › second-order methods
newton's method |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Faster Newton Methods for Convex and Nonconvex Optimization in Gradient Complexity · COLT 2026 |
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Second-Order Min-Max Optimization with Lazy Hessians · ICLR 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › numerical computation › numerical optimization
second-order methods |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Second-Order Min-Max Optimization with Lazy Hessians · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
bilevel optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On Finding Small Hyper-Gradients in Bilevel Optimization: Hardness Results and Improved Analysis · COLT 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › distributed optimization
decentralized optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Decentralized Convex Finite-Sum Optimization with Better Dependence on Condition Numbers · ICML 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
finite-sum optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Decentralized Convex Finite-Sum Optimization with Better Dependence on Condition Numbers · ICML 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › bilevel optimization
hypergradient estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On Finding Small Hyper-Gradients in Bilevel Optimization: Hardness Results and Improved Analysis · COLT 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › minimax optimization
nonconvex-nonconcave minimax |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Near-Optimal Algorithms for Making the Gradient Small in Stochastic Minimax Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › bilevel optimization
simple bilevel optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Functionally Constrained Algorithm Solves Convex Simple Bilevel Problem · NeurIPS 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › riemannian optimization
stiefel manifold optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Near-Optimal Algorithms for Making the Gradient Small in Stochastic Minimax Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
variance reduction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Decentralized Convex Finite-Sum Optimization with Better Dependence on Condition Numbers · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › distributed optimization
communication-efficient optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Communication Efficient Distributed Newton Method with Fast Convergence Rates · KDD 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Faster Gradient-Free Algorithms for Nonsmooth Nonconvex Stochastic Optimization · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › non-convex optimization
non-smooth non-convex optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Faster Gradient-Free Algorithms for Nonsmooth Nonconvex Stochastic Optimization · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
second-order optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Communication Efficient Distributed Newton Method with Fast Convergence Rates · KDD 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Faster Gradient-Free Algorithms for Nonsmooth Nonconvex Stochastic Optimization · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › black-box optimization
zeroth-order optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Faster Gradient-Free Algorithms for Nonsmooth Nonconvex Stochastic Optimization · ICML 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › distributed optimization
distributed newton method |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Communication Efficient Distributed Newton Method with Fast Convergence Rates · KDD 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
distributed optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Communication Efficient Distributed Newton Method with Fast Convergence Rates · KDD 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
polyak-łojasiewicz condition |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Faster Stochastic Algorithms for Minimax Optimization under Polyak-{\L}ojasiewicz Condition · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Faster Stochastic Algorithms for Minimax Optimization under Polyak-{\L}ojasiewicz Condition · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › non-convex optimization
saddle point escape |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Near-Optimal Nonconvex-Strongly-Convex Bilevel Optimization with Fully First-Order Oracles · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
oracle complexity |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Near-Optimal Algorithms for Making the Gradient Small in Stochastic Minimax Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › global optimization
lipschitz optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Functionally Constrained Algorithm Solves Convex Simple Bilevel Problem · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
first-order methods · 2.3second-order method · 1.9nesterov's momentum · 1.7polyak-łojasiewicz condition · 1.5distributed newton method · 1.3gradient complexity · 1.0two-time-scale update · 0.9two time-scale update · 0.9newton-type method · 0.9lazy hessian · 0.9recursive anchored iteration · 0.8mini-batch gradient estimation · 0.8functionally constrained reformulation · 0.8extra anchored gradient · 0.8stochastic recursive gradient estimator · 0.7hessian lipschitz analysis · 0.7gradient-free method · 0.7goldstein stationary point · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Faster Newton Methods for Convex and Nonconvex Optimization in Gradient ComplexityabstractSecond-order optimization methods are computationally expensive for large-scale problems. Recently, Doikov, Chayti, and Jaggi (ICML 2023) proposed the LazyCRN method that reduces computation by studying the gradient complexity of second-order methods. Their method can achieve a gradient complexity of $\mathcal{O}( \bar d + \bar d^{1/2} \epsilon^{-3/2})$ and $\mathcal{O}( \bar d + \bar d^{1/2} \epsilon^{-1/2})$ for nonconvex and convex optimization, respectively, where $\bar d$ is the effective dimension and $\epsilon$ is the target precision. Very recently, Adil, Bullins, Sidford, and Zhang (NeurIPS 2025) improved the gradient complexity to $\mathcal{O}( \bar d + \bar d^{1/3} \epsilon^{-3/2} \ln^{18} \epsilon^{-1})$ for nonconvex optimization. However, the tightness of these methods remains open. In this work, we propose new methods that achieve an improved complexity of $\mathcal{O}( \bar d + \bar d^{1/3} \epsilon^{-3/2})$ and $\mathcal{O}( (\bar d + \bar d^{13/21} \epsilon^{-2/7}) \ln \bar d)$ for nonconvex and convex optimization, respectively, improving best-known results for both setups. Lesi Chen, Chengchang Liu, Luo Luo, Jingzhao Zhang |
COLT | 1 |
| 2025 | Solving Convex-Concave Problems with 풪(ε-4/7) Second-Order Oracle Complexity
Lesi Chen, Chengchang Liu, Luo Luo, Jingzhao Zhang |
COLT | 1 |
| 2025 | Second-Order Min-Max Optimization with Lazy HessiansabstractThis paper studies second-order methods for convex-concave minimax optimization.
Monteiro & Svaiter (2012) proposed a method to solve the problem with an optimal iteration complexity of
$\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^{-3/2})$ to find an $\epsilon$-saddle point. However, it is unclear whether the
computational complexity, $\mathcal{O}((N+ d^2) d \epsilon^{-2/3})$, can be improved. In the above, we follow Doikov et al. (2023) and assume the complexity of obtaining a first-order oracle as $N$ and the complexity of obtaining a second-order oracle as $dN$.
In this paper, we show that the computation cost can be reduced by reusing Hessian across iterations. Our methods take the overall computational complexity of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}( (N+d^2)(d+ d^{2/3}\epsilon^{-2/3}))$, which improves those of previous methods by a factor of $d^{1/3}$.
Furthermore, we generalize our method to strongly-convex-strongly-concave minimax problems and establish the complexity of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}((N+d^2) (d + d^{2/3} \kappa^{2/3}) )$ when the condition number of the problem is $\kappa$, enjoying a similar speedup upon the state-of-the-art method.
Numerical experiments on both real and synthetic datasets also verify the efficiency of our method. Lesi Chen, Chengchang Liu, Jingzhao Zhang |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | Near-Optimal Nonconvex-Strongly-Convex Bilevel Optimization with Fully First-Order OraclesabstractIn this work, we consider bilevel optimization when the lower-level problem is strongly convex. Recent works show that with a Hessian-vector product (HVP) oracle, one can provably find an $\epsilon$-stationary point within ${O}(\epsilon^{-2})$ oracle calls. However, the HVP oracle may be inaccessible or expensive in practice. Kwon et al. (ICML 2023) addressed this issue by proposing a first-order method that can achieve the same goal at a slower rate of $\tilde{O}(\epsilon^{-3})$. In this paper, we incorporate a two-time-scale update to improve their method to achieve the near-optimal $\tilde{O}(\epsilon^{-2})$ first-order oracle complexity. Our analysis is highly extensible. In the stochastic setting, our algorithm can achieve the stochastic first-order oracle complexity of $\tilde {O}(\epsilon^{-4})$ and $\tilde {O}(\epsilon^{-6})$ when the stochastic noises are only in the upper-level objective and in both level objectives, respectively. When the objectives have higher-order smoothness conditions, our deterministic method can escape saddle points by injecting noise, and can be accelerated to achieve a faster rate of $\tilde {O}(\epsilon^{-1.75})$ using Nesterov's momentum. Lesi Chen, Yaohua Ma, Jingzhao Zhang |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2024 | An Efficient Stochastic Algorithm for Decentralized Nonconvex-Strongly-Concave Minimax OptimizationabstractThis paper studies the stochastic nonconvex-strongly-concave minimax optimization over a multi-agent network. We propose an efficient algorithm, called Decentralized Recursive gradient descEnt Ascent Method (DREAM), which achieves the best-known theoretical guarantee for finding the $\epsilon$-stationary points. Concretely, it requires $\mathcal{O}(\min (\kappa^3\epsilon^{-3},\kappa^2 \sqrt{N} \epsilon^{-2} ))$ stochastic first-order oracle (SFO) calls and $\tilde \mathcal O(\kappa^2 \epsilon^{-2})$ communication rounds, where $\kappa$ is the condition number and $N$ is the total number of individual functions. Our numerical experiments also validate the superiority of DREAM over previous methods. Lesi Chen, Haishan Ye, Luo Luo |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2024 | On Finding Small Hyper-Gradients in Bilevel Optimization: Hardness Results and Improved AnalysisabstractBilevel optimization reveals the inner structure of otherwise oblique optimization problems, such as hyperparameter tuning, neural architecture search, and meta-learning. A common goal in bilevel optimization is to minimize a hyper-objective that implicitly depends on the solution set of the lower-level function. Although this hyper-objective approach is widely used, its theoretical properties have not been thoroughly investigated in cases where \textit{the lower-level functions lack strong convexity}. In this work, we first provide hardness results to show that the goal of finding stationary points of the hyper-objective for nonconvex-convex bilevel optimization can be intractable for zero-respecting algorithms. Then we study a class of tractable nonconvex-nonconvex bilevel problems when the lower-level function satisfies the Polyak-Ł{}ojasiewicz (PL) condition. We show a simple first-order algorithm can achieve complexity bounds of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\epsilon^{-2})$, $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\epsilon^{-4})$ and $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\epsilon^{-6})$ in the deterministic, partially stochastic, and fully stochastic setting respectively. Lesi Chen, Jing Xu 0027, Jingzhao Zhang |
COLT | 1 |
| 2024 | Decentralized Convex Finite-Sum Optimization with Better Dependence on Condition NumbersabstractThis paper studies decentralized optimization problem, where the local objective on each node is an average of a finite set of convex functions and the global function is strongly convex. We propose an efficient stochastic variance reduced first-order method that allows the different nodes to establish their stochastic local gradient estimator with different mini-batch sizes per iteration. We prove the upper bound on the computation time of the proposed method contains the dependence on the global condition number, which is sharper than the previous results that only depend on the local condition numbers. Compared with the state-of-the-art methods, we also show that our method requires less local incremental first-order oracle calls and comparable communication cost. We further perform numerical experiments to validate the advantage of our method. Yuxing Liu, Lesi Chen, Luo Luo |
ICML | 2 |
| 2024 | Functionally Constrained Algorithm Solves Convex Simple Bilevel ProblemabstractThis paper studies simple bilevel problems, where a convex upper-level function is minimized over the optimal solutions of a convex lower-level problem. We first show the fundamental difficulty of simple bilevel problems, that the approximate optimal value of such problems is not obtainable by first-order zero-respecting algorithms. Then we follow recent works to pursue the weak approximate solutions. For this goal, we propose a novel method by reformulating them into functionally constrained problems. Our method achieves near-optimal rates for both
smooth and nonsmooth problems. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first near-optimal algorithm that works under standard assumptions of smoothness or Lipschitz continuity for the objective functions. Huaqing Zhang 0005, Lesi Chen, Jing Xu 0027, Jingzhao Zhang |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | Near-Optimal Algorithms for Making the Gradient Small in Stochastic Minimax OptimizationabstractWe study the problem of finding a near-stationary point for smooth minimax optimization. The recently proposed extra anchored gradient (EAG) methods achieve the optimal convergence rate for the convex-concave minimax problem in the deterministic setting. However, the direct extension of EAG to stochastic optimization is not efficient. In this paper, we design a novel stochastic algorithm called Recursive Anchored IteratioN (RAIN). We show that the RAIN achieves near-optimal stochastic first-order oracle (SFO) complexity for stochastic minimax optimization in both convex-concave and strongly-convex-strongly-concave cases. In addition, we extend the idea of RAIN to solve structured nonconvex-nonconcave minimax problem and it also achieves near-optimal SFO complexity. Lesi Chen, Luo Luo |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2023 | Faster Gradient-Free Algorithms for Nonsmooth Nonconvex Stochastic OptimizationabstractWe consider the optimization problem of the form $\min_{x \in \mathbb{R}^d} f(x) \triangleq \mathbb{E}[F(x;\xi)]$ , where the component $F(x;\xi)$ is $L$-mean-squared Lipschitz but possibly nonconvex and nonsmooth.The recently proposed gradient-free method requires at most $\mathcal{O}( L^4 d^{3/2} \epsilon^{-4} + \Delta L^3 d^{3/2} \delta^{-1} \epsilon^{-4})$ stochastic zeroth-order oracle complexity to find a $(\delta,\epsilon)$-Goldstein stationary point of objective function, where $\Delta = f(x_0) - \inf_{x \in \mathbb{R}^d} f(x)$ and $x_0$ is the initial point of the algorithm. This paper proposes a more efficient algorithm using stochastic recursive gradient estimators, which improves the complexity to $\mathcal{O}(L^3 d^{3/2} \epsilon^{-3}+ \Delta L^2 d^{3/2} \delta^{-1} \epsilon^{-3})$. Lesi Chen, Jing Xu 0027, Luo Luo |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Communication Efficient Distributed Newton Method with Fast Convergence RatesabstractWe propose a communication and computation efficient second-order method for distributed optimization. For each iteration, our method only requires O (d) communication complexity, where d is the problem dimension. We also provide theoretical analysis to show the proposed method has the similar convergence rate as the classical second-order optimization algorithms. Concretely, our method can find (∈, √dLe,)-second-order stationary points for nonconvex problem by O (√dL,∈-3/2) iterations, where L is the Lipschitz constant of Hessian. Moreover, it enjoys a local superlinear convergence under the strongly-convex assumption. Experiments on both convex and nonconvex problems show that our proposed method performs significantly better than baselines. Chengchang Liu, Lesi Chen, Luo Luo, John C. S. Lui |
KDD | 2 |
| 2022 | Faster Stochastic Algorithms for Minimax Optimization under Polyak-{\L}ojasiewicz ConditionabstractThis paper considers stochastic first-order algorithms for minimax optimization under Polyak-{\L}ojasiewicz (PL) conditions. We propose SPIDER-GDA for solving the finite-sum problem of the form $\min_x \max_y f(x,y)\triangleq \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n f_i(x,y)$, where the objective function $f(x,y)$ is $\mu_x$-PL in $x$ and $\mu_y$-PL in $y$; and each $f_i(x,y)$ is $L$-smooth. We prove SPIDER-GDA could find an $\epsilon$-approximate solution within ${\mathcal O}\left((n + \sqrt{n}\,\kappa_x\kappa_y^2)\log (1/\epsilon)\right)$ stochastic first-order oracle (SFO) complexity, which is better than the state-of-the-art method whose SFO upper bound is ${\mathcal O}\big((n + n^{2/3}\kappa_x\kappa_y^2)\log (1/\epsilon)\big)$, where $\kappa_x\triangleq L/\mu_x$ and $\kappa_y\triangleq L/\mu_y$.For the ill-conditioned case, we provide an accelerated algorithm to reduce the computational cost further. It achieves $\tilde{{\mathcal O}}\big((n+\sqrt{n}\,\kappa_x\kappa_y)\log^2 (1/\epsilon)\big)$ SFO upper bound when $\kappa_x\geq\sqrt{n}$. Our ideas also can be applied to the more general setting that the objective function only satisfies PL condition for one variable. Numerical experiments validate the superiority of proposed methods. Lesi Chen, Boyuan Yao, Luo Luo |
NeurIPS | 1 |