David Boetius

dblp:327/1678 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-9071-1695ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 82% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 18%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › heuristic search
branch-and-bound search
0.912025
Solving Probabilistic Verification Problems of Neural Networks using Branch and Bound · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
neural network verification
0.912025
Solving Probabilistic Verification Problems of Neural Networks using Branch and Bound · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › verification
probabilistic verification
0.912025
Solving Probabilistic Verification Problems of Neural Networks using Branch and Bound · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
verification
0.912025
Solving Probabilistic Verification Problems of Neural Networks using Branch and Bound · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
neural network repair
0.712023
A Robust Optimisation Perspective on Counterexample-Guided Repair of Neural Networks · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.712023
A Robust Optimisation Perspective on Counterexample-Guided Repair of Neural Networks · ICML 2023
Mathematical optimization › optimization under uncertainty
robust optimization
0.712023
A Robust Optimisation Perspective on Counterexample-Guided Repair of Neural Networks · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

verifier · 1.3quadratic programming · 1.3falsifier · 1.3branch-and-bound · 0.9bound propagation · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Solving Probabilistic Verification Problems of Neural Networks using Branch and Bound
abstract
Probabilistic verification problems of neural networks are concerned with formally analysing the output distribution of a neural network under a probability distribution of the inputs. Examples of probabilistic verification problems include verifying the demographic parity fairness notion or quantifying the safety of a neural network. We present a new algorithm for solving probabilistic verification problems of neural networks based on an algorithm for computing and iteratively refining lower and upper bounds on probabilities over the outputs of a neural network. By applying state-of-the-art bound propagation and branch and bound techniques from non-probabilistic neural network verification, our algorithm significantly outpaces existing probabilistic verification algorithms, reducing solving times for various benchmarks from the literature from tens of minutes to tens of seconds. Furthermore, our algorithm compares favourably even to dedicated algorithms for restricted probabilistic verification problems. We complement our empirical evaluation with a theoretical analysis, proving that our algorithm is sound and, under mildly restrictive conditions, also complete when using a suitable set of heuristics.
David Boetius, Stefan Leue, Tobias Sutter
ICML1
2023 A Robust Optimisation Perspective on Counterexample-Guided Repair of Neural Networks
abstract
Counterexample-guided repair aims at creating neural networks with mathematical safety guarantees, facilitating the application of neural networks in safety-critical domains. However, whether counterexample-guided repair is guaranteed to terminate remains an open question. We approach this question by showing that counterexample-guided repair can be viewed as a robust optimisation algorithm. While termination guarantees for neural network repair itself remain beyond our reach, we prove termination for more restrained machine learning models and disprove termination in a general setting. We empirically study the practical implications of our theoretical results, demonstrating the suitability of common verifiers and falsifiers for repair despite a disadvantageous theoretical result. Additionally, we use our theoretical insights to devise a novel algorithm for repairing linear regression models based on quadratic programming, surpassing existing approaches.
David Boetius, Stefan Leue, Tobias Sutter
ICML1
2022 SpecRepair: Counter-Example Guided Safety Repair of Deep Neural Networks
Fabian Bauer-Marquart, David Boetius, Stefan Leue, Christian Schilling 0001
SPIN2