Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Qianxiang Ma

dblp:327/3808 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
High-performance computing · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
High-performance computing › numerical linear algebra
dense matrix decomposition
0.612022
Scalable Linear Time Dense Direct Solver for 3-D Problems without Trailing Sub-Matrix Dependencies · SC 2022
High-performance computing › numerical linear algebra
parallel linear algebra
0.612022
Scalable Linear Time Dense Direct Solver for 3-D Problems without Trailing Sub-Matrix Dependencies · SC 2022
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems
0.612022
Scalable Linear Time Dense Direct Solver for 3-D Problems without Trailing Sub-Matrix Dependencies · SC 2022
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
matrix factorization
0.212022
Scalable Linear Time Dense Direct Solver for 3-D Problems without Trailing Sub-Matrix Dependencies · SC 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

h2-matrices · 1.1HSS matrices · 1.1Cholesky/LU factorization · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 O(N) distributed direct factorization of structured dense matrices using runtime systems
abstract
Structured dense matrices result from boundary integral problems in electrostatics and geostatistics, and also Schur complements in sparse preconditioners such as multi-frontal methods. Exploiting the structure of such matrices can reduce the time for dense direct factorization from O(N3) to O(N). The Hierarchically Semi-Separable (HSS) matrix is one such low rank matrix format that can be factorized using a Cholesky-like algorithm called ULV factorization. The HSS-ULV algorithm is highly parallel because it removes the dependency on trailing sub-matrices at each HSS level. However, a key merge step that links two successive HSS levels remains a challenge for efficient parallelization. In this paper, we use an asynchronous runtime system PaRSEC with the HSS-ULV algorithm. We compare our work with STRUMPACK and LORAPO, both state-of-the-art implementations of dense direct low rank factorization, and achieve up to 2x better factorization time for matrices arising from a diverse set of applications on up to 128 nodes of Fugaku for similar or better accuracy for all the problems that we survey.
Sameer Deshmukh, Rio Yokota, George Bosilca, Qianxiang Ma
ICPP4
2022 Scalable Linear Time Dense Direct Solver for 3-D Problems without Trailing Sub-Matrix Dependencies
abstract
Factorization of large dense matrices are ubiquitous in engineering and data science applications, e.g. preconditioners for iterative boundary integral solvers, frontal matrices in sparse multifrontal solvers, and computing the determinant of covariance matrices. HSS and$\mathcal{H}^{2}$-matrices are hierarchical low-rank matrix formats that can reduce the complexity of factorizing such dense matrices from$\mathrm{O}(N^{3})$to$\mathrm{O}(N)$. For HSS matrices, it is possible to remove the dependency on the trailing matrices during Cholesky/LU factorization, which results in a highly parallel algorithm. However, the weak admissibility of HSS causes the rank of off-diagonal blocks to grow for 3-D problems, and the method is no longer$\mathrm{O}(N)$. On the other hand, the strong admissibility of$\mathcal{H}^{2}$-matrices allows it to handle 3-D problems in$\mathcal{O}(N)$, but introduces a dependency on the trailing matrices. In the present work, we pre-compute the fill-ins and integrate them into the shared basis, which allows us to remove the dependency on trailing-matrices even for$\mathcal{H}^{2}$-matrices. Comparisons with a block low-rank factorization code LORAPO showed a maximum speed up of 4,700x for a 3-D problem with complex geometry.
Qianxiang Ma, Sameer Deshmukh, Rio Yokota
SC1