Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bernhard Jaeger
dblp:327/9257
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-6657-2499ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Autonomous driving · 43% Deep learning architectures and training · 19% Robot navigation and mapping · 16% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Autonomous driving
end-to-end driving |
2.1 | 3 | 2024 | End-to-End Autonomous Driving: Challenges and Frontiers · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024 TransFuser: Imitation With Transformer-Based Sensor Fusion for Autonomous Driving · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 Hidden Biases of End-to-End Driving Models · ICCV 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | GTA: A Geometry-Aware Attention Mechanism for Multi-View Transformers · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
multi-view transformer |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | GTA: A Geometry-Aware Attention Mechanism for Multi-View Transformers · ICLR 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
novel view synthesis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | GTA: A Geometry-Aware Attention Mechanism for Multi-View Transformers · ICLR 2024 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception and planning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | End-to-End Autonomous Driving: Challenges and Frontiers · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | TransFuser: Imitation With Transformer-Based Sensor Fusion for Autonomous Driving · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
maneuver anticipation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Hidden Biases of End-to-End Driving Models · ICCV 2023 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
sensor fusion |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | TransFuser: Imitation With Transformer-Based Sensor Fusion for Autonomous Driving · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › mobile robot navigation › navigation planning
waypoint prediction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Hidden Biases of End-to-End Driving Models · ICCV 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Hidden Biases of End-to-End Driving Models · ICCV 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Hidden Biases of End-to-End Driving Models · ICCV 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
visual pre-training · 0.8relative transformation · 0.8positional encoding · 0.8foundation model · 0.8transformer · 0.7self-attention · 0.7multimodal waypoint averaging · 0.7inductive bias analysis · 0.7LiDAR-camera fusion · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | GTA: A Geometry-Aware Attention Mechanism for Multi-View TransformersabstractAs transformers are equivariant to the permutation of input tokens, encoding the positional information of tokens is necessary for many tasks. However, since existing positional encoding schemes have been initially designed for NLP tasks, their suitability for vision tasks, which typically exhibit different structural properties in their data, is questionable. We argue that existing positional encoding schemes are suboptimal for 3D vision tasks, as they do not respect their underlying 3D geometric structure. Based on this hypothesis, we propose a geometry-aware attention mechanism that encodes the geometric structure of tokens as relative transformation determined by the geometric relationship between queries and key-value pairs. By evaluating on multiple novel view synthesis (NVS) datasets in the sparse wide-baseline multi-view setting, we show that our attention, called Geometric Transform Attention (GTA), improves learning efficiency and performance of state-of-the-art transformer-based NVS models without any additional learned parameters and only minor computational overhead. Takeru Miyato, Bernhard Jaeger, Max Welling, Andreas Geiger 0001 |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2024 | End-to-End Autonomous Driving: Challenges and FrontiersabstractThe autonomous driving community has witnessed a rapid growth in approaches that embrace an end-to-end algorithm framework, utilizing raw sensor input to generate vehicle motion plans, instead of concentrating on individual tasks such as detection and motion prediction. End-to-end systems, in comparison to modular pipelines, benefit from joint feature optimization for perception and planning. This field has flourished due to the availability of large-scale datasets, closed-loop evaluation, and the increasing need for autonomous driving algorithms to perform effectively in challenging scenarios. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive analysis of more than 270 papers, covering the motivation, roadmap, methodology, challenges, and future trends in end-to-end autonomous driving. We delve into several critical challenges, including multi-modality, interpretability, causal confusion, robustness, and world models, amongst others. Additionally, we discuss current advancements in foundation models and visual pre-training, as well as how to incorporate these techniques within the end-to-end driving framework. Li Chen 0008, Penghao Wu, Kashyap Chitta, Bernhard Jaeger, Andreas Geiger 0001, Hongyang Li 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 4 |
| 2023 | Hidden Biases of End-to-End Driving ModelsabstractEnd-to-end driving systems have recently made rapid progress, in particular on CARLA. Independent of their major contribution, they introduce changes to minor system components. Consequently, the source of improvements is unclear. We identify two biases that recur in nearly all state-of-the-art methods and are critical for the observed progress on CARLA: (1) lateral recovery via a strong inductive bias towards target point following, and (2) longitudinal averaging of multimodal waypoint predictions for slowing down. We investigate the drawbacks of these biases and identify principled alternatives. By incorporating our insights, we develop TF++, a simple end-to-end method that ranks first on the Longest6 and LAV benchmarks, gaining 11 driving score over the best prior work on Longest6. Bernhard Jaeger, Kashyap Chitta, Andreas Geiger 0001 |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2023 | TransFuser: Imitation With Transformer-Based Sensor Fusion for Autonomous DrivingabstractHow should we integrate representations from complementary sensors for autonomous driving? Geometry-based fusion has shown promise for perception (e.g., object detection, motion forecasting). However, in the context of end-to-end driving, we find that imitation learning based on existing sensor fusion methods underperforms in complex driving scenarios with a high density of dynamic agents. Therefore, we propose TransFuser, a mechanism to integrate image and LiDAR representations using self-attention. Our approach uses transformer modules at multiple resolutions to fuse perspective view and bird's eye view feature maps. We experimentally validate its efficacy on a challenging new benchmark with long routes and dense traffic, as well as the official leaderboard of the CARLA urban driving simulator. At the time of submission, TransFuser outperforms all prior work on the CARLA leaderboard in terms of driving score by a large margin. Compared to geometry-based fusion, TransFuser reduces the average collisions per kilometer by 48%. Kashyap Chitta, Aditya Prakash 0001, Bernhard Jaeger, Zehao Yu 0002, Katrin Renz, Andreas Geiger 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 3 |