Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michail Savvas
dblp:327/9600
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Logic in computer science · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › hierarchical reinforcement learning
compositional reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Categorical Semantics of Compositional Reinforcement Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Logic in computer science
categorical semantics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Categorical Semantics of Compositional Reinforcement Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
safe reinforcement learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Categorical Semantics of Compositional Reinforcement Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
zig-zag diagrams · 1.7pushout operations · 1.7category theory · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Categorical Semantics of Compositional Reinforcement LearningabstractCompositional knowledge representations in reinforcement learning (RL) facilitate modular, interpretable, and safe task specifications. However, generating compositional models requires the characterization of minimal assumptions for the robustness of the compositionality feature, especially in the case of functional decompositions. Using a categorical point of view, we develop a knowledge representation framework for a compositional theory of RL. Our approach relies on the theoretical study of the category $\mathsf{MDP}$, whose objects are Markov decision processes (MDPs) acting as models of tasks. The categorical semantics models the compositionality of tasks through the application of pushout operations akin to combining puzzle pieces. As a practical application of these pushout operations, we introduce zig-zag diagrams that rely on the compositional guarantees engendered by the category $\mathsf{MDP}$. We further prove that properties of the category $\mathsf{MDP}$ unify concepts, such as enforcing safety requirements and exploiting symmetries, generalizing previous abstraction theories for RL. Georgios Bakirtzis, Michail Savvas, Ufuk Topcu |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2024 | Reduce, Reuse, Recycle: Categories for Compositional Reinforcement LearningabstractIn reinforcement learning, conducting task composition by forming cohesive, executable sequences from multiple tasks remains challenging. However, the ability to (de)compose tasks is a linchpin in developing robotic systems capable of learning complex behaviors. Yet, compositional reinforcement learning is beset with difficulties, including the high dimensionality of the problem space, scarcity of rewards, and absence of system robustness after task composition. To surmount these challenges, we view task composition through the prism of category theory—a mathematical discipline exploring structures and their compositional relationships. The categorical properties of Markov decision processes untangle complex tasks into manageable sub-tasks, allowing for strategical reduction of dimensionality, facilitating more tractable reward structures, and bolstering system robustness. Experimental results support the categorical theory of reinforcement learning by enabling skill reduction, reuse, and recycling when learning complex robotic arm tasks. Georgios Bakirtzis, Michail Savvas, Ruihan Zhao 0001, Sandeep Chinchali, Ufuk Topcu |
ECAI | 2 |