Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zhantao Liu
dblp:328/0883
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Internet of things and sensor networks · 39% Network measurement and analytics · 30% Network management and operations · 30% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Systems and software security · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Network management and operations
attack graph |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | TS-VulA: A Triple-Stage Vulnerability Analysis Framework for Industrial Internet of Things · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2026 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › iot security
industrial iot security |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | TS-VulA: A Triple-Stage Vulnerability Analysis Framework for Industrial Internet of Things · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2026 |
Network measurement and analytics › security measurement
vulnerability analysis |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | TS-VulA: A Triple-Stage Vulnerability Analysis Framework for Industrial Internet of Things · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2026 |
Systems and software security › vulnerability management
vulnerability assessment |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | TS-VulA: A Triple-Stage Vulnerability Analysis Framework for Industrial Internet of Things · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2026 |
Systems and software security
vulnerability discovery |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | TS-VulA: A Triple-Stage Vulnerability Analysis Framework for Industrial Internet of Things · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2026 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
industrial iot |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | TS-VulA: A Triple-Stage Vulnerability Analysis Framework for Industrial Internet of Things · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-layer heterogeneous network · 2.0attack graph · 2.0SentenceBERT · 2.0ModernBERT · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | A Membrane Potential Communication-based Network-on-chip for Merge-core-free Spiking Neural Network Deployment
Weilai Chu, Zhantao Liu, Youming Liu, Pujun Zhou, Guanchao Qiao, Shaogang Hu |
ISCAS | 2 |
| 2026 | TS-VulA: A Triple-Stage Vulnerability Analysis Framework for Industrial Internet of ThingsabstractIndustrial Internet of Things (IIoT) faces increasing security risks with wide applications. Compared with the Internet, the IIoT has a broader attack surface and unique structural characteristics, posing difficulties in directly transferring the previous vulnerability analysis techniques. This paper proposes a triple-stage vulnerability analysis framework (TS-VulA) for IIoT via attack graphs combining ModernBERT and multi-layer heterogeneous networks, which includes three stages. In the first stage, the SentenceBERT based on ModernBERT and IIoT disruption losses are combined to conduct a single-node vulnerability assessment from the aspects of likelihood and criticality of vulnerability exploitation. In the second stage, an IIoT device importance calculation based on multi-layer heterogeneous network theory is proposed, which can acquire the inherent relationships among various IIoT devices. Stage 3 extends attack graph rules for IIoT, then computes node priorities by integrating vulnerability assessment and device importance, which can guide the mitigation strategy. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed vulnerability assessment method achieves an average accuracy and average precision of 87.86% and 87.33%, both exceeding the existing methods. Simulated case studies illustrate that the proposed TS-VulA outperforms the prevailing vulnerability analysis methods. Fangyuan Xing, Zhantao Liu, Fei Tong 0001, Shibo He, Guang Cheng 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 2 |
| 2022 | Automatic Detection of Prostate Cancer Systemic Lesions Based on Deep Learning and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CTabstractThe identification of lesions is critical for the diagnostic evaluation of prostate cancer.68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT is a specific imaging for prostate cancer. However, this is extremely challenging considering the large number of lesions of varying size and uptake that may be distributed in various anatomical settings with different backgrounds throughout the body. In this paper, we propose a deep learning approach for automatic detection of whole-body prostate cancer lesions on PSMA imaging. We established and evaluated our model on the68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT image dataset of 107 patients with metastatic prostate cancer, and finally obtained Precision, Recall and F1-score of 82.9%, 100% and 90.6%, respectively, on the independent test set. Preliminary tests confirmed the potential of our method for disease detection on a systemic scale. Increasing the amount of training data can further improve the performance of the proposed deep learning method. Shaonan Zhong, Zhantao Liu, Zhaohong Pan, Bingsheng Huang, Qinqin Yang |
CBMS | 3 |