Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lisa Rennels

dblp:328/3385 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-5307-9336ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 61% Empirical software engineering · 30% Requirements engineering and software design · 9%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering
developer studies
0.712023
How Domain Experts Use an Embedded DSL · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2023
Programming languages and type systems
domain-specific languages
0.712023
How Domain Experts Use an Embedded DSL · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2023
Programming languages and type systems › domain-specific languages
embedded domain-specific languages
0.712023
How Domain Experts Use an Embedded DSL · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

thematic analysis · 0.7contextual inquiry · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 How Domain Experts Use an Embedded DSL
abstract
Programming tools are increasingly integral to research and analysis in myriad domains, including specialized areas with no formal relation to computer science. Embedded domain-specific languages (eDSLs) have the potential to serve these programmers while placing relatively light implementation burdens on language designers. However, barriers to eDSL use reduce their practical value and adoption. In this paper, we aim to deepen our understanding of how programmers use eDSLs and identify user needs to inform future eDSL designs. We performed a contextual inquiry (9 participants) with domain experts using Mimi, an eDSL for climate change economics modeling. A thematic analysis identified five key themes, including: the interaction between the eDSL and the host language has significant and sometimes unexpected impacts on eDSL user experience, and users preferentially engage with domain-specific communities and code templates rather than host language resources. The needs uncovered in our study offer design considerations for future eDSLs and suggest directions for future DSL usability research.
Lisa Rennels, Sarah E. Chasins
Proc. ACM Program. Lang.1