Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jaiyoung Ryu
dblp:328/8557
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › scientific machine learning
neural PDE solvers |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | BubbleML: A Multiphase Multiphysics Dataset and Benchmarks for Machine Learning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computational science and engineering
multiphysics simulation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | BubbleML: A Multiphase Multiphysics Dataset and Benchmarks for Machine Learning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
physics-driven simulation · 2.0optical flow analysis · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | BubbleML: A Multiphase Multiphysics Dataset and Benchmarks for Machine LearningabstractIn the field of phase change phenomena, the lack of accessible and diverse datasets suitable for machine learning (ML) training poses a significant challenge. Existing experimental datasets are often restricted, with limited availability and sparse ground truth, impeding our understanding of this complex multiphysics phenomena. To bridge this gap, we present the BubbleML dataset which leverages physics-driven simulations to provide accurate ground truth information for various boiling scenarios, encompassing nucleate pool boiling, flow boiling, and sub-cooled boiling. This extensive dataset covers a wide range of parameters, including varying gravity conditions, flow rates, sub-cooling levels, and wall superheat, comprising 79 simulations. BubbleML is validated against experimental observations and trends, establishing it as an invaluable resource for ML research. Furthermore, we showcase its potential to facilitate the exploration of diverse downstream tasks by introducing two benchmarks: (a) optical flow analysis to capture bubble dynamics, and (b) neural PDE solvers for learning temperature and flow dynamics. The BubbleML dataset and its benchmarks aim to catalyze progress in ML-driven research on multiphysics phase change phenomena, providing robust baselines for the development and comparison of state-of-the-art techniques and models. Sheikh Md Shakeel Hassan, Arthur Feeney, Akash Dhruv, Youngjoon Suh, Jaiyoung Ryu, Yoonjin Won, Aparna Chandramowlishwaran |
NeurIPS | 6 |