Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shu-Qiao Li
dblp:329/0443
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-0806-8216ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 50% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 50% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Approximation and online algorithms · 50% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
algorithm selection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Cascaded Algorithm Selection With Extreme-Region UCB Bandit · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Cascaded Algorithm Selection With Extreme-Region UCB Bandit · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
multi-armed bandit |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Cascaded Algorithm Selection With Extreme-Region UCB Bandit · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 |
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Cascaded Algorithm Selection With Extreme-Region UCB Bandit · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
upper confidence bound · 1.1regret analysis · 1.1anytime tuning · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Cascaded Algorithm Selection With Extreme-Region UCB BanditabstractAutoML aims at best configuring learning systems automatically. It contains core subtasks of algorithm selection and hyper-parameter tuning. Previous approaches considered searching in the joint hyper-parameter space of all algorithms, which forms a huge but redundant space and causes an inefficient search. We tackle this issue in acascaded algorithm selectionway, which contains an upper-level process of algorithm selection and a lower-level process of hyper-parameter tuning for algorithms. While the lower-level process employs ananytimetuning approach, the upper-level process is naturally formulated as a multi-armed bandit, deciding which algorithm should be allocated one more piece of time for the lower-level tuning. To achieve the goal of finding the best configuration, we propose theExtreme-Region Upper Confidence Bound(ER-UCB) strategy. Unlike UCB bandits that maximize the mean of feedback distribution, ER-UCB maximizes the extreme-region of feedback distribution. We first consider stationary distributions and propose the ER-UCB-S algorithm that has$O(K\ln n)$regret upper bound with$K$arms and$n$trials. We then extend to non-stationary settings and propose the ER-UCB-N algorithm that has$O(Kn^\nu)$regret upper bound, where$\frac{2}{3}<\nu <1$. Finally, empirical studies on synthetic and AutoML tasks verify the effectiveness of ER-UCB-S/N by their outperformance in corresponding settings. Yi-Qi Hu, Xu-Hui Liu, Shu-Qiao Li, Yang Yu 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 3 |