Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Amol Khanna

dblp:329/1865 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-5566-095XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 53% Optimization for machine learning · 47%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness evaluation
adversarial attack evaluation
0.912025
Stop Walking in Circles! Bailing Out Early in Projected Gradient Descent · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.912025
Stop Walking in Circles! Bailing Out Early in Projected Gradient Descent · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization › gradient descent
projected gradient descent
0.912025
Stop Walking in Circles! Bailing Out Early in Projected Gradient Descent · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › constrained optimization
frank-wolfe algorithm
0.712023
Scaling Up Differentially Private LASSO Regularized Logistic Regression via Faster Frank-Wolfe Iterations · NeurIPS 2023
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private learning
differentially private regression
0.712023
Scaling Up Differentially Private LASSO Regularized Logistic Regression via Faster Frank-Wolfe Iterations · NeurIPS 2023
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.712023
Scaling Up Differentially Private LASSO Regularized Logistic Regression via Faster Frank-Wolfe Iterations · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

l1 regularization · 1.3frank-wolfe · 1.3early termination · 0.9cycle detection · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Differentially Private Iterative Screening Rules for Linear Regression
abstract
Linear L1-regularized models have remained one of the simplest and most effective tools in data science. Over the past decade, screening rules have risen in popularity as a way to eliminate features when producing the sparse regression weights of L1 models. However, despite the increasing need of privacy-preserving models for data analysis, to the best of our knowledge, no differentially private screening rule exists. In this paper, we develop the first private screening rule for linear regression. We initially find that this screening rule is too strong: it screens too many coefficients as a result of the private screening step. However, a weakened implementation of private screening reduces overscreening and improves performance.
Amol Khanna, Fred Lu, Edward Raff
CODASPY1
2025 Stop Walking in Circles! Bailing Out Early in Projected Gradient Descent
abstract
Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) under the L∞ ball has become one of the defacto methods used in adversarial robustness evaluation for computer vision (CV) due to its reliability and efficacy, making a strong and easy-to-implement iterative baseline. However, PGD is computationally demanding to apply, especially when using thousands of iterations is the current best-practice recommendation to generate an adversarial example for a single image. In this work, we introduce a simple novel method for early termination of PGD based on cycle detection by exploiting the geometry of how PGD is implemented in practice and show that it can produce large speedup factors while providing the exact same estimate of model robustness as standard PGD. This method substantially speeds up PGD without sacrificing any attack strength, enabling evaluations of robustness that were previously computationally intractable.
Philip Doldo, Derek Everett, Amol Khanna, André T. Nguyen, Edward Raff
CVPR3
2023 Scaling Up Differentially Private LASSO Regularized Logistic Regression via Faster Frank-Wolfe Iterations
abstract
To the best of our knowledge, there are no methods today for training differentially private regression models on sparse input data. To remedy this, we adapt the Frank-Wolfe algorithm for $L_1$ penalized linear regression to be aware of sparse inputs and to use them effectively. In doing so, we reduce the training time of the algorithm from $\mathcal{O}( T D S + T N S)$ to $\mathcal{O}(N S + T \sqrt{D} \log{D} + T S^2)$, where $T$ is the number of iterations and a sparsity rate $S$ of a dataset with $N$ rows and $D$ features. Our results demonstrate that this procedure can reduce runtime by a factor of up to $2,200\times$, depending on the value of the privacy parameter $\epsilon$ and the sparsity of the dataset.
Edward Raff, Amol Khanna, Fred Lu
NeurIPS2