Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lena Podina

dblp:329/4011 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Computing education · 50% Computational science and engineering · 50%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computing education › educational assessment
peer grading
0.712023
Better Peer Grading through Bayesian Inference · AAAI 2023
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning › physics-informed machine learning
physics-informed neural networks
0.712023
Universal Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Symbolic Differential Operator Discovery with Sparse Data · ICML 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge discovery
equation discovery
0.212023
Universal Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Symbolic Differential Operator Discovery with Sparse Data · ICML 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
symbolic regression
0.212023
Universal Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Symbolic Differential Operator Discovery with Sparse Data · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

symbolic regression · 1.3physics-informed neural networks · 1.3AI Feynman · 1.3mixed-integer programming · 0.7bayesian inference · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Better Peer Grading through Bayesian Inference
abstract
Peer grading systems aggregate noisy reports from multiple students to approximate a "true" grade as closely as possible. Most current systems either take the mean or median of reported grades; others aim to estimate students’ grading accuracy under a probabilistic model. This paper extends the state of the art in the latter approach in three key ways: (1) recognizing that students can behave strategically (e.g., reporting grades close to the class average without doing the work); (2) appropriately handling censored data that arises from discrete-valued grading rubrics; and (3) using mixed integer programming to improve the interpretability of the grades assigned to students. We demonstrate how to make Bayesian inference practical in this model and evaluate our approach on both synthetic and real-world data obtained by using our implemented system in four large classes. These extensive experiments show that grade aggregation using our model accurately estimates true grades, students' likelihood of submitting uninformative grades, and the variation in their inherent grading error; we also characterize our models' robustness.
Hedayat Zarkoob, Greg d'Eon, Lena Podina, Kevin Leyton-Brown
AAAI3
2023 Universal Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Symbolic Differential Operator Discovery with Sparse Data
abstract
In this work we perform symbolic discovery of differential operators in a situation where there is sparse experimental data. This small data regime in machine learning can be made tractable by providing our algorithms with prior information about the underlying dynamics. Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have been very successful in this regime (reconstructing entire ODE solutions using only a single point or entire PDE solutions with very few measurements of the initial condition). The Universal PINN approach (UPINN) adds a neural network that learns a representation of unknown hidden terms in the differential equation. The algorithm yields both a surrogate solution to the differential equation and a black-box representation of the hidden terms. These hidden term neural networks can then be converted into symbolic equations using symbolic regression techniques like AI Feynman. In order to achieve convergence of the neural networks, we provide our algorithms with (noisy) measurements of both the initial condition as well as (synthetic) experimental data obtained at later times. We demonstrate strong performance of UPINNs even when provided with very few measurements of noisy data in both the ODE and PDE regime.
Lena Podina, Brydon Eastman, Mohammad Kohandel
ICML1