Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dilina Chandika Rajapakse
dblp:329/4099
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-9722-9108ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 81% Information retrieval · 19% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommender systems
sequential recommendation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Reassessing the Effectiveness of Reinforcement Learning based Recommender Systems for Sequential Recommendation · SIGIR 2025 |
Information retrieval
evaluation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Reassessing the Effectiveness of Reinforcement Learning based Recommender Systems for Sequential Recommendation · SIGIR 2025 |
Recommender systems › recommender system evaluation
evaluation protocol |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Reassessing the Effectiveness of Reinforcement Learning based Recommender Systems for Sequential Recommendation · SIGIR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-supervised q-learning · 0.9reproducibility study · 0.9reinforcement learning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Reassessing the Effectiveness of Reinforcement Learning based Recommender Systems for Sequential RecommendationabstractOver the past few years, researchers have explored the use of reinforcement learning (RL) for sequential recommendation problems. However, since RL techniques commonly target at optimizing long-term rewards, it is surprising that RL-based models are reported to be competitive with traditional supervised models when evaluated under the myopic next-item prediction protocol. A recent study suggests that reported performance gains of combining RL with supervised learning techniques, as done in the Self-Supervised Q-Learning (SQN) framework, may actually not come from learning an optimal policy, but that the RL component helps to learn embeddings that encode the users' past interactions. Given these observations, we aimed to reassess the performance of RL-enhanced sequential recommendations in the SQN framework. While we were able to reproduce the results reported in the respective papers, we found that properly-tuned supervised learning models like GRU4Rec substantially outperform the proposed RL-models from the literature. Our analyses furthermore revealed that there is a significant inconsistency in terms of evaluation protocols in the literature, and that the use of third-party implementations of existing models may lead to unreliable conclusions. Overall, still more research and alternative evaluation schemes seem required to fully leverage the power of RL for sequential recommendation tasks. Dilina Chandika Rajapakse, Dietmar Jannach |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2025 | User Cold-Start Learning in Recommender Systems using Monte Carlo Tree SearchabstractWe consider the cold-start task for new users of a recommender system, whereby a new user is asked to rate a few items with the aim of quickly discovering the user’s preferences. This is a combinatorial stochastic learning task, and so it is difficult in general. In this paper we study the use of Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to dynamically select the sequence of items presented to a new user. We find that the MCTS-based cold-start approach is able to consistently quickly identify the preferences of a user with significantly higher accuracy than with either a decision tree or a state-of-the-art bandit-based approach without incurring higher regret, i.e., the learning performance is fundamentally superior to that of the state of the art. This boost in recommender accuracy is achieved in a computationally lightweight fashion. The MCTS approach is flexible in the sense that it can be readily extended to incorporate different types of user feedback including explicit ratings, ranked comparisons and missing not at random data. Dilina Chandika Rajapakse, Douglas J. Leith |
Trans. Recomm. Syst. | 1 |
| 2022 | Fast and Accurate User Cold-Start Learning Using Monte Carlo Tree SearchabstractWe revisit the cold-start task for new users of a recommender system whereby a new user is asked to rate a few items with the aim of discovering the user’s preferences. This is a combinatorial stochastic learning task, and so difficult in general. In this paper we propose using Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to dynamically select the sequence of items presented to a new user. We find that this new MCTS-based cold-start approach is able to consistently quickly identify the preferences of a user with significantly higher accuracy than with either a decision-tree or a state of the art bandit-based approach without incurring higher regret i.e the learning performance is fundamentally superior to that of the state of the art. This boost in recommender accuracy is achieved in a computationally lightweight fashion. Dilina Chandika Rajapakse, Douglas J. Leith |
RecSys | 1 |