Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Saroj Prasad Chhatoi

dblp:329/4631 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-1187-3689ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 77% Robot manipulation · 23%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
compliant motion control
0.712023
Optimal Control for Articulated Soft Robots · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › trajectory optimization
differential dynamic programming
0.712023
Optimal Control for Articulated Soft Robots · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization
0.712023
Optimal Control for Articulated Soft Robots · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023
Robotics › Robot manipulation › actuator design › compliant actuator
variable stiffness actuation
0.712023
Optimal Control for Articulated Soft Robots · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › feedback control
state feedback control
0.212023
Optimal Control for Articulated Soft Robots · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

state feedback control · 0.7differential dynamic programming · 0.7analytical derivatives · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Optimal Control for Articulated Soft Robots
abstract
Soft robots can execute tasks with safer interactions. However, control techniques that can effectively exploit the systems' capabilities are still missing. Differential dynamic programming (DDP) has emerged as a promising tool for achieving highly dynamic tasks. But most of the literature deals with applying the DDP to articulated soft robots by using numerical differentiation, in addition to using pure feed-forward control to perform explosive tasks. Further, underactuated compliant robots are known to be difficult to control and the use of DDP-based algorithms to control them is not yet addressed. We propose an efficient DDP-based algorithm for trajectory optimization of articulated soft robots that can optimize the state trajectory, input torques, and stiffness profile. We provide an efficient method to compute the forward dynamics and the analytical derivatives of series elastic actuators (SEA)/variable stiffness actuators (VSA) and underactuated compliant robots. We present a state-feedback controller that uses locally optimal feedback policies obtained from the DDP. We show through simulations and experiments that the use of feedback is crucial in improving the performance and stabilization properties of various tasks. We also show that the proposed method can be used to plan and control underactuated compliant robots with varying degrees of underactuation effectively.
Saroj Prasad Chhatoi, Michele Pierallini, Franco Angelini, Carlos Mastalli, Manolo Garabini
IEEE Trans. Robotics1
2023 Inverse-Dynamics MPC via Nullspace Resolution
abstract
Optimal control (OC) using inverse dynamics provides numerical benefits, such as coarse optimization, cheaper computation of derivatives, and a high convergence rate. However, to take advantage of these benefits in model predictive control (MPC) for legged robots, it is crucial to handle efficiently its large number of equality constraints. To accomplish this, we first propose a novel approach to handle equality constraints based on nullspace parameterization. Our approach balances optimality, and both dynamics and equality-constraint feasibility appropriately, which increases the basin of attraction to high-quality local minima. To do so, we modify our feasibility-driven search by incorporating a merit function. Furthermore, we introduce a condensed formulation of inverse dynamics that considers arbitrary actuator models. We also propose a novel MPC based on inverse dynamics within a perceptive locomotion framework. Finally, we present a theoretical comparison of OC with forward and inverse dynamics and evaluate both numerically. Our approach enables the first application of inverse-dynamics MPC on hardware, resulting in the state-of-the-art dynamic climbing on the ANYmal robot. We benchmark it over a wide range of robotics problems and generate agile and complex maneuvers. We show the computational reduction of our nullspace resolution and condensed formulation (up to${47.3}\boldsymbol{\%}$). We provide evidence of the benefits of our approach by solving coarse optimization problems with a high convergence rate (up to 10 Hz of discretization). Our algorithm is publicly available insideCrocoddyl.
Carlos Mastalli, Saroj Prasad Chhatoi, Thomas Corbères, Steve Tonneau, Sethu Vijayakumar
IEEE Trans. Robotics2