Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Amit Mualem
dblp:329/5228
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 67% Recommender systems · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommender systems
explainable recommendation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | FEDEX: An Explainability Framework for Data Exploration Steps · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2022 |
Data mining
exploratory data analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | FEDEX: An Explainability Framework for Data Exploration Steps · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2022 |
Data mining › pattern mining › association rule mining
interestingness measures |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | FEDEX: An Explainability Framework for Data Exploration Steps · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
semantic relatedness · 0.6exceptionality measure · 0.6diversity measure · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | FEDEX: An Explainability Framework for Data Exploration StepsabstractWhen exploring a new dataset, Data Scientists often apply analysis queries, look for insights in the resulting dataframe, and repeat to apply further queries. We propose in this paper a novel solution that assists data scientists in this laborious process. In a nutshell, our solution pinpoints the most interesting (sets of) rows in each obtained dataframe. Uniquely, our definition of interest is based on the contribution of each row to the interestingness of different columns of the entire dataframe, which, in turn, is defined using standard measures such as diversity and exceptionality. Intuitively, interesting rows are ones that explain why (some column of) the analysis query result is interesting as a whole. Rows are correlated in their contribution and so the interesting score for a set of rows may not be directly computed based on that of individual rows. We address the resulting computational challenge by restricting attention to semantically-related sets, based on multiple notions of semantic relatedness; these sets serve as more informative explanations. Our experimental study across multiple real-world datasets shows the usefulness of our system in various scenarios. Daniel Deutch, Amir Gilad, Tova Milo, Amit Mualem, Amit Somech |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 4 |