Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ali Asghar Beigizad
dblp:329/5354
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Hardware security and side channels · 59% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 41% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardware security and side channels
fault attacks |
1.8 | 2 | 2026 | Algebraic Linked Fault Analysis on PHOTON-Beetle AEAD · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2026 Linked Fault Analysis · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
authenticated encryption |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Algebraic Linked Fault Analysis on PHOTON-Beetle AEAD · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2026 |
Hardware security and side channels › fault attacks
differential fault analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Linked Fault Analysis · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › cryptanalysis
fault analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Linked Fault Analysis · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
linked ineffective fault attack · 1.0linked effective fault analysis · 1.0algebraic key recovery · 1.0linked fault analysis · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Algebraic Linked Fault Analysis on PHOTON-Beetle AEADabstractPHOTON-Beetle is an authenticated encryption scheme, which was a finalist in the NIST’s call for standardization in the area of lightweight cryptography (LWC). There are certain difficulties while executing known fault attacks on PHOTON-Beetle in the real world. One of the attacks is in the random fault model, but it requires 237.15faults, which makes it difficult to implement in practice. Other attacks require fewer faults (29.32and 211.5) but rely on the bit-fault models, which necessitates expensive tools and detailed information about the implementation. In this paper, we bridge this gap by presenting an attack that is based on a realistic fault model that requires only 29. We employ a new fault attack technique called linked ineffective fault attack (LIFA). Our attack does not require knowing the plaintext or the corresponding ciphertext. Compared to conventional key-recovery techniques, we provide a highly efficient algebraic method for obtaining the secret key. Furthermore, we introduce linked effective fault analysis (LEFA) and show that, in a noisy environment, LEFA performs significantly better than LIFA in attacking the PHOTON-Beetle while maintaining the basic assumptions of LIFA. We verify our attack using several simulations, as well as conducting practical experiments in the ATmega328P against the publicly available PHOTON-Beetle implementation made available by the designers. Mohammadsadeq Borjiyan-Borujeni, Hadi Soleimany, Ali Asghar Beigizad |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. | 3 |
| 2024 | Linked Fault AnalysisabstractNumerous fault models with distinct characteristics and effects have been developed. The costs, repeatability, and practicability of these models should be assessed. Moreover, there must be effective ways to use the injected fault to retrieve the secret key, particularly if the implementation includes any countermeasures. In this paper, we introduce a new fault analysis called “linked fault analysis” (LFA), a more powerful technique than other well-known fault attacks against implementations of symmetric primitives, especially in software implementations. For known fault analysis, the basis for the fault model is either the bias over the faulty value or the relationship between the correct value and the faulty one. In the LFA, however, a single fault involves two intermediate values. The faulty target variable,$u'$, is linked to a second variable,$v$, such that a particular relation holds:$u'=l(v)$. LFA lets the attacker perform fault attacks without the input control, using far fewer data than previously introduced fault attacks in the same class. We show the utilization of LFA in the presence or absence of typical redundancy-based countermeasures by introducing “Linked Differential Fault Analysis” (LDFA) and “Linked Ineffective Fault Analysis” (LIFA). We also demonstrate that, under specific circumstances, LFA is still effective even when masking protections are in place. We have performed our attacks against the public implementation of AES and PRESENT in ATMEGA328p to show the feasibility of LFA in the real world. The practical results and simulations validate our theoretical models as well. Ali Asghar Beigizad, Hadi Soleimany, Sara Zarei 0001, Hamed Ramzanipour |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 1 |