Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pingyi Hu

dblp:329/5364 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0006-5616-7418ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
5 papers
Security and privacy of machine learning · 82% Privacy and data protection · 16% Systems and software security · 2%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 54% Trustworthy machine learning · 46%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Security and privacy of machine learning › model intellectual property protection › model ownership verification
model fingerprinting
1.622025
RESF: Regularized-Entropy-Sensitive Fingerprinting for Black-Box Tamper Detection of Large Language Models · EMNLP 2025
Towards Stricter Black-box Integrity Verification of Deep Neural Network Models · ACM Multimedia 2024
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack
0.912025
Consensus-Robust Transfer Attacks via Parameter and Representation Perturbations · NeurIPS 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial robustness
0.912025
Consensus-Robust Transfer Attacks via Parameter and Representation Perturbations · NeurIPS 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning › model security
model integrity
0.912025
RESF: Regularized-Entropy-Sensitive Fingerprinting for Black-Box Tamper Detection of Large Language Models · EMNLP 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
transferable adversarial attack
0.912025
Consensus-Robust Transfer Attacks via Parameter and Representation Perturbations · NeurIPS 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning › verifiable machine learning
model integrity verification
0.812024
Towards Stricter Black-box Integrity Verification of Deep Neural Network Models · ACM Multimedia 2024
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving machine learning
split learning
0.712023
Focusing on Pinocchio's Nose: A Gradients Scrutinizer to Thwart Split-Learning Hijacking Attacks Using Intrinsic Attributes · NDSS 2023
Security and privacy of machine learning
membership inference
0.612022
M$^4$I: Multi-modal Models Membership Inference · NeurIPS 2022
Privacy and data protection › information leakage
privacy leakage
0.612022
M$^4$I: Multi-modal Models Membership Inference · NeurIPS 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
large language model deployment
0.312025
RESF: Regularized-Entropy-Sensitive Fingerprinting for Black-Box Tamper Detection of Large Language Models · EMNLP 2025
Systems and software security
exploitation
0.212023
Focusing on Pinocchio's Nose: A Gradients Scrutinizer to Thwart Split-Learning Hijacking Attacks Using Intrinsic Attributes · NDSS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequential test · 1.7hypothesis testing · 1.7entropy-gradient norm · 1.7LoRA fine-tuning · 1.7KL divergence surrogate · 1.7fingerprinting · 1.5representation perturbation · 0.9parameter perturbation · 0.9monte carlo sampling · 0.9consensus-robust optimization · 0.9meta-learning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 RESF: Regularized-Entropy-Sensitive Fingerprinting for Black-Box Tamper Detection of Large Language Models
abstract
The proliferation of Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) has enabled widespread deployment of large language models (LLMs) via cloud APIs, but also raises critical concerns about model integrity and security.Existing black-box tamper detection methods, such as watermarking and fingerprinting, rely on the stability of model outputs-a property that does not hold for inherently stochastic LLMs.We address this challenge by formulating blackbox tamper detection for LLMs as a hypothesistesting problem.To enable efficient and sensitive fingerprinting, we derive a first-order surrogate for KL divergence-the entropy-gradient norm-to identify prompts most responsive to parameter perturbations.Building on this, we propose Regularized Entropy-Sensitive Fingerprinting (RESF), which enhances sensitivity while regularizing entropy to improve output stability and control false positives.To further distinguish tampering from benign randomness, such as temperature shifts, RESF employs a lightweight two-tier sequential test combining support-based and distributional checks with rigorous false-alarm control.Comprehensive analysis and experiments across multiple LLMs show that RESF achieves up to 98.80% detection accuracy under challenging conditions, such as minimal LoRA fine-tuning with five optimized fingerprints.RESF consistently demonstrates strong sensitivity and robustness, providing an effective and scalable solution for black-box tamper detection in cloud-deployed LLMs.
Pingyi Hu, Xiaofan Bai, Xiaojing Ma 0002, Chaoxiang He, Dongmei Zhang 0001, Bin B. Zhu
EMNLP1
2025 Consensus-Robust Transfer Attacks via Parameter and Representation Perturbations
abstract
Adversarial examples crafted on one model often exhibit poor transferability to others, hindering their effectiveness in black-box settings. This limitation arises from two key factors: (i) \emph{decision-boundary variation} across models and (ii) \emph{representation drift} in feature space. We address these challenges through a new perspective that frames transferability for \emph{untargeted attacks} as a \emph{consensus-robust optimization} problem: adversarial perturbations should remain effective across a neighborhood of plausible target models. To model this uncertainty, we introduce two complementary perturbation channels: a \emph{parameter channel}, capturing boundary shifts via weight perturbations, and a \emph{representation channel}, addressing feature drift via stochastic blending of clean and adversarial activations. We then propose \emph{CORTA} (COnsensus--Robust Transfer Attack), a lightweight attack instantiated from this robust formulation using two first-order strategies: (i) sensitivity regularization based on the squared Frobenius norm of logits’ Jacobian with respect to weights, and (ii) Monte Carlo sampling for blended feature representations. Our theoretical analysis provides a certified lower bound linking these approximations to the robust objective. Extensive experiments on CIFAR-100 and ImageNet show that CORTA significantly outperforms state-of-the-art transfer-based methods---including ensemble approaches---across CNN and Vision Transformer targets. Notably, CORTA achieves a \emph{19.1 percentage-point gain in transfer success rate over the best prior method} while using only a single surrogate model.
Shixin Li 0001, Xiaojing Ma 0002, Xiaofan Bai, Pingyi Hu, Dongmei Zhang 0001, Bin B. Zhu
NeurIPS5
2024 Towards Stricter Black-box Integrity Verification of Deep Neural Network Models
abstract
Cloud-based machine learning services offer significant advantages but also introduce the risk of tampering with cloud-deployed deep neural network (DNN) models. Black-box integrity verification (BIV) allows model owners and end-users to determine if a cloud-deployed DNN model has been tampered with by examining only the top-1 label responses. Fingerprinting generates fingerprint samples to query the model, achieving BIV with no impact on the model's accuracy. In this paper, we present BIVBench, the first comprehensive benchmark for BIV of DNN models. BIVBench covers 16 types of model modifications, providing extensive coverage of practical modification scenarios. Our analysis reveals that existing fingerprinting methods, which are typically focused on significant tampering, lack the sensitivity needed to effectively detect subtle yet common and potentially severe modifications. To address this limitation, we propose MiSentry (Model Integrity Sentry), a novel fingerprinting method that leverages meta-learning. MiSentry strategically incorporates a few subtly modified models into the meta-learning model zoo and maximizes the divergence of output predictions between the target model and the modified models in the model zoo to generate highly sensitive, generalizable, and effective fingerprint samples. Extensive evaluations using BIVBench demonstrate that MiSentry outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods overall and significantly surpasses them in detecting subtle modifications. The BIVBench and supplementary materials are available at: https://github.com/CGCL-codes/BIVBench.
Chaoxiang He, Xiaofan Bai, Xiaojing Ma 0002, Bin B. Zhu, Pingyi Hu, Jiayun Fu, Hai Jin 0001, Dongmei Zhang 0001
ACM Multimedia5
2023 Focusing on Pinocchio's Nose: A Gradients Scrutinizer to Thwart Split-Learning Hijacking Attacks Using Intrinsic Attributes
Jiayun Fu, Xiaojing Ma 0002, Bin B. Zhu, Pingyi Hu, Ruixin Zhao, Yaru Jia, Peng Xu 0003, Hai Jin 0001, Dongmei Zhang 0001
NDSS4
2022 M$^4$I: Multi-modal Models Membership Inference
abstract
With the development of machine learning techniques, the attention of research has been moved from single-modal learning to multi-modal learning, as real-world data exist in the form of different modalities. However, multi-modal models often carry more information than single-modal models and they are usually applied in sensitive scenarios, such as medical report generation or disease identification. Compared with the existing membership inference against machine learning classifiers, we focus on the problem that the input and output of the multi-modal models are in different modalities, such as image captioning. This work studies the privacy leakage of multi-modal models through the lens of membership inference attack, a process of determining whether a data record involves in the model training process or not. To achieve this, we propose Multi-modal Models Membership Inference (M$^4$I) with two attack methods to infer the membership status, named metric-based (MB) M$^4$I and feature-based (FB) M$^4$I, respectively. More specifically, MB M$^4$I adopts similarity metrics while attacking to infer target data membership. FB M$^4$I uses a pre-trained shadow multi-modal feature extractor to achieve the purpose of data inference attack by comparing the similarities from extracted input and output features. Extensive experimental results show that both attack methods can achieve strong performances. Respectively, 72.5% and 94.83% of attack success rates on average can be obtained under unrestricted scenarios. Moreover, we evaluate multiple defense mechanisms against our attacks. The source code of M$^4$I attacks is publicly available at https://github.com/MultimodalMI/Multimodal-membership-inference.git.
Pingyi Hu, Ruoxi Sun 0001, Hu Wang 0005, Minhui Xue 0001
NeurIPS1