Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yassir Akram

dblp:329/5709 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 55% Language models and text generation · 17% Learning theory · 6%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 16 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
compositional generalization
2.532025
Scaling can lead to compositional generalization · NeurIPS 2025
Attention as a Hypernetwork · ICLR 2025
Discovering modular solutions that generalize compositionally · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
2.532025
Attention as a Hypernetwork · ICLR 2025
Learning Randomized Algorithms with Transformers · ICLR 2025
Weight decay induces low-rank attention layers · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism
0.912025
Attention as a Hypernetwork · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
hypernetwork
0.912025
Attention as a Hypernetwork · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory
randomized learning
0.912025
Learning Randomized Algorithms with Transformers · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scaling laws
0.912025
Scaling can lead to compositional generalization · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism › attention module
attention layer
0.812024
Weight decay induces low-rank attention layers · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
implicit regularization
0.812024
Weight decay induces low-rank attention layers · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
low-rank regularization
0.812024
Weight decay induces low-rank attention layers · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning
0.812024
Discovering modular solutions that generalize compositionally · ICLR 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
modularity
0.812024
Discovering modular solutions that generalize compositionally · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
modular policy
0.812024
Discovering modular solutions that generalize compositionally · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization
0.812024
Weight decay induces low-rank attention layers · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization › norm-based regularization
weight decay
0.812024
Weight decay induces low-rank attention layers · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation
0.312025
Scaling can lead to compositional generalization · NeurIPS 2025
Algorithms and data structures
randomized algorithms
0.312025
Learning Randomized Algorithms with Transformers · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gradient descent · 1.7multilayer perceptron approximation · 0.9linear decoding · 0.9evolutionary strategy · 0.9evolutionary strategies · 0.9nuclear norm regularization · 0.8l2 regularization · 0.8hypernetwork · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Learning Randomized Algorithms with Transformers
abstract
Randomization is a powerful tool that endows algorithms with remarkable properties. For instance, randomized algorithms excel in adversarial settings, often surpassing the worst-case performance of deterministic algorithms with large margins. Furthermore, their success probability can be amplified by simple strategies such as repetition and majority voting. In this paper, we enhance deep neural networks, in particular transformer models, with randomization. We demonstrate for the first time that randomized algorithms can be instilled in transformers through learning, in a purely data- and objective-driven manner. First, we analyze known adversarial objectives for which randomized algorithms offer a distinct advantage over deterministic ones. We then show that common optimization techniques, such as gradient descent or evolutionary strategies, can effectively learn transformer parameters that make use of the randomness provided to the model. To illustrate the broad applicability of randomization in empowering neural networks, we study three conceptual tasks: associative recall, graph coloring, and agents that explore grid worlds. In addition to demonstrating increased robustness against oblivious adversaries through learned randomization, our experiments reveal remarkable performance improvements due to the inherently random nature of the neural networks' computation and predictions.
Johannes von Oswald, Seijin Kobayashi, Yassir Akram, Angelika Steger
ICLR3
2025 Attention as a Hypernetwork
abstract
Transformers can under some circumstances generalize to novel problem instances whose constituent parts might have been encountered during training, but whose compositions have not. What mechanisms underlie this ability for compositional generalization? By reformulating multi-head attention as a hypernetwork, we reveal that a composable, low-dimensional latent code specifies key-query specific operations. We find empirically that this latent code is predictive of the subtasks the network performs on unseen task compositions, revealing that latent codes acquired during training are reused to solve unseen problem instances. To further examine the hypothesis that the intrinsic hypernetwork of multi-head attention supports compositional generalization, we ablate whether making the hypernetwork-generated linear value network nonlinear strengthens compositionality. We find that this modification improves compositional generalization on abstract reasoning tasks. In particular, we introduce a symbolic version of the Raven's Progressive Matrices human intelligence test, which gives us precise control over the problem compositions encountered during training and evaluation. We demonstrate on this task how scaling model size and data enables compositional generalization in transformers and gives rise to a functionally structured latent space.
Simon Schug, Seijin Kobayashi, Yassir Akram, João Sacramento, Razvan Pascanu
ICLR3
2025 Scaling can lead to compositional generalization
abstract
Can neural networks systematically capture discrete, compositional task structure despite their continuous, distributed nature? The impressive capabilities of large-scale neural networks suggest that the answer to this question is yes. However, even for the most capable models, there are still frequent failure cases that raise doubts about their compositionality. Here, we seek to understand what it takes for a standard neural network to generalize over tasks that share compositional structure. We find that simply scaling data and model size leads to compositional generalization. We show that this holds across different task encodings as long as the training distribution sufficiently covers the task space. In line with this finding, we prove that standard multilayer perceptrons can approximate a general class of compositional task families to arbitrary precision using only a linear number of neurons with respect to the number of task modules. Finally, we uncover that if networks successfully compositionally generalize, the constituents of a task can be linearly decoded from their hidden activations. We show that this metric correlates with failures of text-to-image generation models to compose known concepts.
Florian Redhardt, Yassir Akram, Simon Schug
NeurIPS2
2024 Discovering modular solutions that generalize compositionally
abstract
Many complex tasks can be decomposed into simpler, independent parts. Discovering such underlying compositional structure has the potential to enable compositional generalization. Despite progress, our most powerful systems struggle to compose flexibly. It therefore seems natural to make models more modular to help capture the compositional nature of many tasks. However, it is unclear under which circumstances modular systems can discover hidden compositional structure. To shed light on this question, we study a teacher-student setting with a modular teacher where we have full control over the composition of ground truth modules. This allows us to relate the problem of compositional generalization to that of identification of the underlying modules. In particular we study modularity in hypernetworks representing a general class of multiplicative interactions. We show theoretically that identification up to linear transformation purely from demonstrations is possible without having to learn an exponential number of module combinations. We further demonstrate empirically that under the theoretically identified conditions, meta-learning from finite data can discover modular policies that generalize compositionally in a number of complex environments.
Simon Schug, Seijin Kobayashi, Yassir Akram, Maciej Wolczyk, Alexandra Maria Proca, Johannes von Oswald, Razvan Pascanu, João Sacramento, Angelika Steger
ICLR3
2024 Weight decay induces low-rank attention layers
abstract
The effect of regularizers such as weight decay when training deep neural networks is not well understood. We study the influence of weight decay as well as $L2$-regularization when training neural network models in which parameter matrices interact multiplicatively. This combination is of particular interest as this parametrization is common in attention layers, the workhorse of transformers. Here, key-query, as well as value-projection parameter matrices, are multiplied directly with each other: $W_K^TW_Q$ and $PW_V$. We extend previous results and show on one hand that any local minimum of a $L2$-regularized loss of the form $L(AB^\top) + \lambda (\|A\|^2 + \|B\|^2)$ coincides with a minimum of the nuclear norm-regularized loss $L(AB^\top) + \lambda\|AB^\top\|_*$, and on the other hand that the 2 losses become identical exponentially quickly during training. We thus complement existing works linking $L2$-regularization with low-rank regularization, and in particular, explain why such regularization on the matrix product affects early stages of training. Based on these theoretical insights, we verify empirically that the key-query and value-projection matrix products $W_K^TW_Q, PW_V$ within attention layers, when optimized with weight decay, as usually done in vision tasks and language modelling, indeed induce a significant reduction in the rank of $W_K^TW_Q$ and $PW_V$, even in fully online training. We find that, in accordance with existing work, inducing low rank in attention matrix products can damage language model performance, and observe advantages when decoupling weight decay in attention layers from the rest of the parameters.
Seijin Kobayashi, Yassir Akram, Johannes von Oswald
NeurIPS2