As real-world networks such as social networks and computer networks are often complex and distributed, modeling them as multilayer graphs is gaining popularity. For instance, when studying social interactions across platforms like LinkedIn, Facebook, TikTok, and Bluesky, users may be connected on several of these platforms. To identify important nodes/users, the platforms might wish to analyze user interactions using, e.g., centrality measures when accounting for connections across all platforms. This raises the challenge for platforms to perform such computation while simultaneously protecting their user data to shelter their own business as well as uphold data protection laws. Hence, it necessitates designing solutions that allow for performing secure computation on a multilayer graph which is distributed among mutually distrusting parties while keeping each party's data hidden. The work of Asharov et al. (WWW'17) addresses this problem by designing secure solutions for centrality measures that involve computing the truncated Katz score and reach score on multilayer graphs. However, we identify several limitations in that work which render the solution inefficient or even unfeasible for realistic networks with significantly more than 10k nodes. We address these limitations by designing secure solutions that are significantly more efficient and scalable. In more detail, given that real-world graphs are known to be sparse, our solutions move away from an expensive matrix-based representation to a more efficient list-based representation. We design novel, secure, and efficient solutions for computing centrality measures and prove their correctness. Our solutions drastically reduce the asymptotic complexity from the prohibitive O(|V|^2) even for the fastest solution by Asharov et al. down to O(|V| log |V|), for |V| nodes. To design our solutions, we extend upon the secure graph computation framework of Koti et al. (CCS'24), providing a novel framework with improved capabilities in multiple directions. Finally, we provide an end-to-end implementation of our secure graph analysis framework and establish concrete efficiency improvements over prior work, observing several orders of magnitude improvement.

Secure multi-party computation (MPC) enables (joint) computations on sensitive data while maintaining privacy. In real-world scenarios, asymmetric trust assumptions are often most realistic, where one somewhat trustworthy entity interacts with smaller clients. We generalize previous two-party computation (2PC) protocols like MUSE (USENIX Security’21) and SIMC (USENIX Security’22) to the three-party setting (3PC) with one malicious party, avoiding the performance limitations of dishonest-majority inherent to 2PC.We introduce two protocols, AUXILIATOR and SOCIUM, in a machine learning (ML) friendly design with a fast online phase and novel verification techniques in the setup phase. These protocols bridge the gap between prior 3PC approaches that considered either fully semi-honest or malicious settings. AUXILIATOR enhances the semi-honest two-party setting with a malicious helper, significantly improving communication by at least two orders of magnitude. SOCIUM extends the client-malicious setting with one malicious client and a semi-honest server, achieving substantial communication improvement by at least one order of magnitude compared to SIMC.Besides an implementation of our new protocols, we provide the first open-source implementation of the semi-honest 3PC protocol ASTRA (CCSW’19) and a variant of the malicious 3PC protocol SWIFT (USENIX Security’21).

The concept of using Lookup Tables (LUTs) instead of Boolean circuits is well-known and been widely applied in a variety of applications, including FPGAs, image processing, and database management systems. In cryptography, using such LUTs instead of conventional gates like AND and XOR results in more compact circuits and has been shown to substantially improve online performance when evaluated with secure multi-party computation. Several recent works on secure floating-point computations and privacy-preserving machine learning inference rely heavily on existing LUT techniques. However, they suffer from either large overhead in the setup phase or subpar online performance.We propose FLUTE, a novel protocol for secure LUT evaluation with good setup and online performance. In a two-party setting, we show that FLUTE matches or even outperforms the online performance of all prior approaches, while being competitive in terms of overall performance with the best prior LUT protocols. In addition, we provide an open-source implementation of FLUTE written in the Rust programming language, and implementations of the Boolean secure two-party computation protocols of ABY2.0 and silent OT. We find that FLUTE outperforms the state of the art by two orders of magnitude in the online phase while retaining similar overall communication.

In this paper, we revisit the problem of secure shuffling in a three-server setting with an honest majority. We begin with the recent work of Araki. et al. (CCS'21) and use precomputation to improve the communication and round complexity of the online phase of their shuffle protocol. Our simple yet effective shuffling method is not limited to three parties and can be used in a variety of situations. Furthermore, the design of our solution allows for fine tuning to achieve improved efficiency based on the underlying application's parameters. Our protocols are initially presented with semi-honest security and then extended to support malicious corruption.