Densely structured pruning methods — which generate pruned models in a fully dense format, allowing immediate compression benefits without additional demands — are evolving due to their practical significance. Traditional techniques in this domain mainly revolve around coarser granularities, such as filter pruning, thereby limiting performance due to restricted pruning freedom. Recent advancements in Grouped Kernel Pruning (GKP) have enabled the utilization of finer granularities while maintaining a densely structured format. We observe that existing GKP methods often introduce dynamic operations to different aspects of their procedures at the cost of adding complications and/or imposing limitations (e.g., requiring an expensive mixture of clustering schemes), or contain dynamic pruning rates and sizes among groups that result in a reliance on custom architecture support for its pruned models. In this work, we argue that the best practice to introduce these dynamic operations to GKP is to make Conv2d(groups) (a.k.a. group count) flexible under an integral optimization, leveraging its ideal alignment with the infrastructure support of Grouped Convolution. Pursuing such a direction, we present a one-shot, post-train, data-agnostic GKP method that is more performant, adaptive, and efficient than its predecessors while simultaneously being user-friendly, with little-to-no hyper-parameter tuning or handcrafting of criteria required.

A significant portion of roads, particularly in densely populated developing countries, lacks explicitly defined right-of-way rules. These understructured roads pose substantial challenges for autonomous vehicle motion planning, where efficient and safe navigation relies on understanding decentralized human coordination for collision avoidance. This coordination, often termed “social driving etiquette,” remains underexplored due to limited open-source empirical data and suitable modeling frameworks. In this paper, we present a novel dataset and modeling framework designed to study motion planning in these understructured environments. The dataset includes 20 aerial videos of representative scenarios, an image dataset for training vehicle detection models, and a development kit for vehicle trajectory estimation. We demonstrate that a consensus-based modeling approach can effectively explain the emergence of priority orders observed in our dataset, and is therefore a viable framework for decentralized collision avoidance planning.

Suppose a self-driving car is crashing into pedestrians, or a chatbot is instructing its users to conduct criminal wrongdoing; the stakeholders of such products will undoubtedly want to patch these catastrophic errors as soon as possible. To address such concerns, Model Editing: the study of efficiently patching model behaviors without significantly altering their general performance, has seen considerable activity, with hundreds of editing techniques developed in various domains such as CV and NLP. However, the graph learning community has objectively fallen behind with only a few Graph Neural Network-compatible — and just one GNN-specific — model editing methods available, where all of which are limited in their practical scope. We argue that the impracticality of these methods lies in their lack of Sequential Editing Robustness: the ability to edit multiple errors sequentially, and therefore fall short in effectiveness, as this approach mirrors how errors are discovered and addressed in the real world. In this paper, we delve into the specific reasons behind the difficulty of editing GNNs in succession and observe the root cause to be model overfitting. We subsequently propose a simple yet effective solution — SEED-GNN — by leveraging overfit-prevention techniques in a GNN-specific context to derive the first and only GNN model editing method that scales practically. Additionally, we formally frame the task paradigm of GNN editing and hope to inspire future research in this crucial but currently overlooked field. Please refer to our GitHub repository for code and checkpoints.

Densely structured pruning methods utilizing simple pruning heuristics can deliver immediate compression and acceleration benefits with acceptable benign performances. However, empirical findings indicate such naively pruned networks are extremely fragile under simple adversarial attacks. Naturally, we would be interested in knowing if such a phenomenon also holds for carefully designed modern structured pruning methods. If so, then to what extent is the severity? And what kind of remedies are available? Unfortunately, both the questions and the solution remain largely unaddressed: no prior art is able to provide a thorough investigation on the adversarial performance of modern structured pruning methods (spoiler: it is not good), yet the few works that attempt to provide mitigation often do so at various extra costs with only to-be-desired performance. In this work, we answer both questions by fairly and comprehensively investigating the adversarial performance of 10+ popular structured pruning methods. Solution-wise, we take advantage of *Grouped Kernel Pruning (GKP)*'s recent success in pushing densely structured pruning freedom to a more fine-grained level. By mixing up kernel smoothness — a classic robustness-related kernel-level metric — into a modified GKP procedure, we present a one-shot-post-train-weight-dependent GKP method capable of advancing SOTA performance on both the benign and adversarial scale, while requiring no extra (in fact, often less) cost than a standard pruning procedure. Please refer to our [GitHub repository](https://github.com/henryzhongsc/adv_robust_gkp) for code implementation, tool sharing, and model checkpoints.