\emph{Learning-augmented algorithms} have been extensively studied in the computer science community recently, particularly in the context of online problems, in which machine-learning predictors can help provide additional information about the future, in order to overcome classical impossibility results. Such algorithms use \emph{advice} prudently to improve the performance of classical algorithms, while ensuring robustness against inaccurate advice. In this paper, we present learning-augmented algorithmic frameworks for two fundamental optimizations settings, extending and generalizing prior works. For \emph{online packing with concave objectives}, we present a simple but overarching strategy that \emph{switches} between the advice and the state-of-the-art online algorithm. For \emph{online covering with convex objectives}, we greatly extend primal-dual methods for online convex covering programs and previous learning-augmented framework for online covering linear programs from the literature, to many new applications. We show that our algorithms break impossibility results when the advice is accurate, while maintaining comparable performance with state-of-the-art classical online algorithms even when the advice is erroneous.

We consider the basic statistical challenge of designing an "all-purpose" mean estimation algorithm that is recommendable across a variety of settings and models. Recent work by [Lee and Valiant 2022] introduced the first 1-d mean estimator whose error in the standard finite-variance+i.i.d. setting is optimal even in its constant factors; experimental demonstration of its good performance was shown by [Gobet et al. 2022]. Yet, unlike for classic (but not necessarily practical) estimators such as median-of-means and trimmed mean, this new algorithm lacked proven robustness guarantees in other settings, including the settings of adversarial data corruption and heavy-tailed distributions with infinite variance. Such robustness is important for practical use cases. This raises a research question: is it possible to have a mean estimator that is robust, without sacrificing provably optimal performance in the standard i.i.d. setting? In this work, we show that Lee and Valiant’s estimator is in fact an "all-purpose" mean estimator by proving: (A) It is robust to an $\eta$-fraction of data corruption, even in the strong contamination model; it has optimal estimation error $O(\sigma\sqrt{\eta})$ for distributions with variance $\sigma^2$. (B) For distributions with finite $z^\text{th}$ moment, for $z \in (1,2)$, it has optimal estimation error, matching the lower bounds of [Devroye et al. 2016] up to constants. We further show (C) that outlier robustness for 1-d mean estimators in fact implies neighborhood optimality, a notion of beyond worst-case and distribution-dependent optimality recently introduced by [Dang et al. 2023]. Previously, such an optimality guarantee was only known for median-of-means, but now it holds also for all estimators that are simultaneously robust and sub-Gaussian, including Lee and Valiant’s, resolving a question raised by Dang et al. Lastly, we show (D) the asymptotic normality and efficiency of Lee and Valiant’s estimator, as further evidence for its performance across many settings.

Semidefinite programming (SDP) is a unifying framework that generalizes both linear programming and quadratically-constrained quadratic programming, while also yielding efficient solvers, both in theory and in practice. However, there exist known impossibility results for approximating the optimal solution when constraints for covering SDPs arrive in an online fashion. In this paper, we study online covering linear and semidefinite programs in which the algorithm is augmented with advice from a possibly erroneous predictor. We show that if the predictor is accurate, we can efficiently bypass these impossibility results and achieve a constant-factor approximation to the optimal solution, i.e., consistency. On the other hand, if the predictor is inaccurate, under some technical conditions, we achieve results that match both the classical optimal upper bounds and the tight lower bounds up to constant factors, i.e., robustness. More broadly, we introduce a framework that extends both (1) the online set cover problem augmented with machine-learning predictors, studied by Bamas, Maggiori, and Svensson (NeurIPS 2020), and (2) the online covering SDP problem, initiated by Elad, Kale, and Naor (ICALP 2016). Specifically, we obtain general online learning-augmented algorithms for covering linear programs with fractional advice and constraints, and initiate the study of learning-augmented algorithms for covering SDP problems. Our techniques are based on the primal-dual framework of Buchbinder and Naor (Mathematics of Operations Research, 34, 2009) and can be further adjusted to handle constraints where the variables lie in a bounded region, i.e., box constraints.