Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yuehe Chen

dblp:329/6714 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-2786-4116ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 44% Trustworthy machine learning · 44% Representation and self-supervised learning · 12%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
Divide-Then-Align: Honest Alignment based on the Knowledge Boundary of RAG · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation
0.912025
Divide-Then-Align: Honest Alignment based on the Knowledge Boundary of RAG · ACL (1) 2025
Data mining › clustering
graph clustering
0.812024
Revisiting Modularity Maximization for Graph Clustering: A Contrastive Learning Perspective · KDD 2024
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining › community detection
modularity maximization
0.812024
Revisiting Modularity Maximization for Graph Clustering: A Contrastive Learning Perspective · KDD 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
graph contrastive learning
0.212024
Revisiting Modularity Maximization for Graph Clustering: A Contrastive Learning Perspective · KDD 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

modularity maximization · 1.5contrastive learning · 1.5retrieval-augmented generation · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Divide-Then-Align: Honest Alignment based on the Knowledge Boundary of RAG
abstract
Xin Sun, Jianan Xie, Zhongqi Chen, Qiang Liu, Shu Wu, Yuehe Chen, Bowen Song, Zilei Wang, Weiqiang Wang, Liang Wang. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Jianan Xie, Zhongqi Chen, Qiang Liu 0006, Yuehe Chen, Zilei Wang, Liang Wang 0001
ACL (1)6
2024 Revisiting Modularity Maximization for Graph Clustering: A Contrastive Learning Perspective
abstract
Graph clustering, a fundamental and challenging task in graph mining, aims to classify nodes in a graph into several disjoint clusters. In recent years, graph contrastive learning (GCL) has emerged as a dominant line of research in graph clustering and advances the new state-of-the-art. However, GCL-based methods heavily rely on graph augmentations and contrastive schemes, which may potentially introduce challenges such as semantic drift and scalability issues. Another promising line of research involves the adoption of modularity maximization, a popular and effective measure for community detection, as the guiding principle for clustering tasks. Despite the recent progress, the underlying mechanism of modularity maximization is still not well understood. In this work, we dig into the hidden success of modularity maximization for graph clustering. Our analysis reveals the strong connections between modularity maximization and graph contrastive learning, where positive and negative examples are naturally defined by modularity. In light of our results, we propose a community-aware graph clustering framework, coined øurs, which leverages modularity maximization as a contrastive pretext task to effectively uncover the underlying information of communities in graphs, while avoiding the problem of semantic drift. Extensive experiments on multiple graph datasets verify the effectiveness of øurs in terms of scalability and clustering performance compared to state-of-the-art graph clustering methods. Notably, øurs easily scales a sufficiently large graph with 100M nodes while outperforming strong baselines.
Jintang Li, Yuehe Chen, Ericbk Wang, Shuheng Shen, Changhua Meng, Weiqiang Wang 0002, Liang Chen 0001
KDD3
2022 Two-Stage Query Graph Selection for Knowledge Base Question Answering
Yonghui Jia, Chuanyuan Tan, Yuehe Chen, Muhua Zhu, Pingfu Chao, Wenliang Chen
NLPCC (2)3