Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Filippo Bigi

dblp:329/8390 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Computational science and engineering · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational science and engineering
computational chemistry
0.912025
The dark side of the forces: assessing non-conservative force models for atomistic machine learning · ICML 2025
Computational science and engineering › computational chemistry › molecular simulation › molecular dynamics
machine learning force field
0.912025
FlashMD: long-stride, universal prediction of molecular dynamics · NeurIPS 2025
Computational science and engineering › materials science
materials discovery
0.912025
The dark side of the forces: assessing non-conservative force models for atomistic machine learning · ICML 2025
Computational science and engineering › computational chemistry › molecular simulation
molecular dynamics
0.912025
FlashMD: long-stride, universal prediction of molecular dynamics · NeurIPS 2025
Computational science and engineering › computational chemistry
molecular force field
0.912025
The dark side of the forces: assessing non-conservative force models for atomistic machine learning · ICML 2025
Computational science and engineering › computational chemistry
molecular simulation
0.912025
The dark side of the forces: assessing non-conservative force models for atomistic machine learning · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › dynamical system
hamiltonian dynamics
0.312025
FlashMD: long-stride, universal prediction of molecular dynamics · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine learning interatomic potential · 1.7hamiltonian dynamics · 1.7molecular dynamics · 0.9machine learning · 0.9geometry optimization · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 The dark side of the forces: assessing non-conservative force models for atomistic machine learning
abstract
The use of machine learning to estimate the energy of a group of atoms, and the forces that drive them to more stable configurations, have revolutionized the fields of computational chemistry and materials discovery. In this domain, rigorous enforcement of symmetry and conservation laws has traditionally been considered essential. For this reason, interatomic forces are usually computed as the derivatives of the potential energy, ensuring energy conservation. Several recent works have questioned this physically constrained approach, suggesting that directly predicting the forces yields a better trade-off between accuracy and computational efficiency – and that energy conservation can be learned during training. This work investigates the applicability of such non-conservative models in microscopic simulations. We identify and demonstrate several fundamental issues, from ill-defined convergence of geometry optimization to instability in various types of molecular dynamics. Contrary to the case of rotational symmetry, energy conservation is hard to learn, monitor, and correct for. The best approach to exploit the acceleration afforded by direct force prediction might be to use it in tandem with a conservative model, reducing – rather than eliminating – the additional cost of backpropagation, but avoiding the pathological behavior associated with non-conservative forces.
Filippo Bigi, Marcel F. Langer, Michele Ceriotti
ICML1
2025 FlashMD: long-stride, universal prediction of molecular dynamics
abstract
Molecular dynamics (MD) provides insights into atomic-scale processes by integrating over time the equations that describe the motion of atoms under the action of interatomic forces. Machine learning models have substantially accelerated MD by providing inexpensive predictions of the forces, but they remain constrained to minuscule time integration steps, which are required by the fast time scale of atomic motion. In this work, we propose FlashMD, a method to predict the evolution of positions and momenta over strides that are between one and two orders of magnitude longer than typical MD time steps. We incorporate considerations on the mathematical and physical properties of Hamiltonian dynamics in the architecture, generalize the approach to allow the simulation of any thermodynamic ensemble, and carefully assess the possible failure modes of a direct MD approach. We validate FlashMD’s accuracy in reproducing equilibrium and time‐dependent properties, using both system‐specific and general-purpose models, extending the ability of MD simulation to reach the long time scales needed to model microscopic processes of high scientific and technological relevance.
Filippo Bigi, Sanggyu Chong, Agustinus Kristiadi, Michele Ceriotti
NeurIPS1