The aliasing error performance of a signature register is measured by the maximum values of the aliasing error probabilities for certain ranges of the bit-error rate (and those of the test length). Based on these measures, we evaluate the performances of all the single input signature registers whose feedback polynomials are primitive polynomials of degree 16 and generator polynomials of the double-error-correcting BCH codes of the same degree. When the degree of the feedback polynomial is large, say 32, it is computationally hard to obtain the exact aliasing probability. But we observe that the numbers of codewords with large weights in the corresponding code dominate the maximum value of the aliasing probabilities. By computing the numbers of codewords of large weights, we find primitive polynomials of degree 32 whose maximum value of the aliasing probabilities is very large for some test lengths. The error performance of an LFSR with any BCH polynomial of degree m for the test length 2/sup m/2/-2 is shown to be very good by deriving the formula for the weight distribution of the corresponding code.>

The aliasing error performance of signature registers is measured by the maximum values of the aliasing error probabilities for certain ranges of the bit-error rate (and those of the test length). Based on these measurements, the authors evaluate the performances of all the single input signature registers whose feedback polynomials are primitive polynomials of degree 16 and generator polynomials of the double-error-correcting BCH codes of the same degree. When the degree of the feedback polynomial is large (e.g. 32), it is computationally hard to obtain the exact value of the aliasing probability. But the authors observe that the numbers of codewords with large weights in the corresponding code determine the maximum value of the aliasing probabilities in the range 0>

The monotonic property of the probability of undetected error is considered when a shortened code of a linear code over GF(q) is used for error detection on a q-ary symmetric channel. Some conditions are presented under which the probability of undetected error is (or is not) monotonic with respect to the code length or the symbol error probability. It is shown that the probability of undetected error for a maximum distance separable code is monotonic with respect to the codelength. It is also shown that the probability of undetected error of a shortened code of any binary cyclic Hamming code generated by a trinomial is not monotonic with respect to the bit-error rate if the code length is short.>