Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

R. Ayesha Ali

dblp:33/1449 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-9098-0126ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 40% Image recognition and object detection · 32% Deep learning architectures and training · 28%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
1.322026
Interpreting Capsule Networks for Image Classification by Routing Path Visualization (Abstract Reprint) · AAAI 2026
Interpreting capsule networks for image classification by routing path visualization · Artif. Intell. 2025
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
1.012026
Interpreting Capsule Networks for Image Classification by Routing Path Visualization (Abstract Reprint) · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
capsule network
0.912025
Interpreting capsule networks for image classification by routing path visualization · Artif. Intell. 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene regulation
0.122006
Dragon Promoter Mapper (DPM): a Bayesian framework for modelling promoter structures · Bioinform. 2006
Promoter modeling: the case study of mammalian histone promoters · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation › promoter analysis
promoter modeling
0.122006
Dragon Promoter Mapper (DPM): a Bayesian framework for modelling promoter structures · Bioinform. 2006
Promoter modeling: the case study of mammalian histone promoters · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
cis-regulatory element analysis
0.012006
Dragon Promoter Mapper (DPM): a Bayesian framework for modelling promoter structures · Bioinform. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

routing path visualization · 1.0visualization · 0.9motif feature analysis · 0.1bayesian network · 0.1consensus modeling · 0.1computational promoter analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Interpreting Capsule Networks for Image Classification by Routing Path Visualization (Abstract Reprint)
abstract
Artificial neural networks are popular for computer vision as they often give state-of-the-art performance, but are difficult to interpret because of their complexity. This black box modeling is especially troubling when the application concerns human well-being such as in medical image analysis or autonomous driving. In this work, we propose a technique called routing path visualization for capsule networks, which reveals how much of each region in an image is routed to each capsule. In turn, this technique can be used to interpret the entity that a given capsule detects, and speculate how the network makes a prediction. We demonstrate our new visualization technique on several real world datasets. Experimental results suggest that routing path visualization can precisely localize the predicted class from an image, even though the capsule networks are trained using just images and their respective class labels, without additional information defining the location of the class in the image.
Amanjot Bhullar, Michael Czomko, R. Ayesha Ali, Douglas L. Welch
AAAI3
2025 Interpreting capsule networks for image classification by routing path visualization
Amanjot Bhullar, Michael Czomko, R. Ayesha Ali, Douglas L. Welch
Artif. Intell.3
2022 Comparative transcriptomics analysis pipeline for the meta-analysis of phylogenetically divergent datasets (CoRMAP)
abstract
BACKGROUND: Transcriptional regulation is a fundamental mechanism underlying biological functions. In recent years, a broad array of RNA-Seq tools have been used to measure transcription levels in biological experiments, in whole organisms, tissues, and at the single cell level. Collectively, this is a vast comparative dataset on transcriptional processes across organisms. Yet, due to technical differences between the studies (sequencing, experimental design, and analysis) extracting usable comparative information and conducting meta-analyses remains challenging. RESULTS: We introduce Comparative RNA-Seq Metadata Analysis Pipeline (CoRMAP), a meta-analysis tool to retrieve comparative gene expression data from any RNA-Seq dataset using de novo assembly, standardized gene expression tools and the implementation of OrthoMCL, a gene orthology search algorithm. It employs the use of orthogroup assignments to ensure the accurate comparison of gene expression levels between experiments and species. Here we demonstrate the use of CoRMAP on two mouse brain transcriptomes with similar scope, that were collected several years from each other using different sequencing technologies and analysis methods. We also compare the performance of CoRMAP with a functional mapping tool, previously published. CONCLUSION: CoRMAP provides a framework for the meta-analysis of RNA-Seq data from divergent taxonomic groups. This method facilitates the retrieval and comparison of gene expression levels from published data sets using standardized assembly and analysis. CoRMAP does not rely on reference genomes and consequently facilitates direct comparison between diverse studies on a range of organisms.
Yiru Sheng, R. Ayesha Ali, Andreas Heyland
BMC Bioinform.2
2006 Dragon Promoter Mapper (DPM): a Bayesian framework for modelling promoter structures
abstract
UNLABELLED: Dragon Promoter Mapper (DPM) is a tool to model promoter structure of co-regulated genes using methodology of Bayesian networks. DPM exploits an exhaustive set of motif features (such as motif, its strand, the order of motif occurrence and mutual distance between the adjacent motifs) and generates models from the target promoter sequences, which may be used to (1) detect regions in a genomic sequence which are similar to the target promoters or (2) to classify other promoters as similar or not to the target promoter group. DPM can also be used for modelling of enhancers and silencers. AVAILABILITY: http://defiant.i2r.a-star.edu.sg/projects/BayesPromoter/ CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Manual for using DPM web server is provided at http://defiant.i2r.a-star.edu.sg/projects/BayesPromoter/html/manual/manual.htm.
Rajesh Chowdhary, Sin Lam Tan, R. Ayesha Ali, Brent Boerlage, Limsoon Wong, Vladimir B. Bajic
Bioinform.3
2005 Modeling 5' regions of histone genes using Bayesian networks
Rajesh Chowdhary, R. Ayesha Ali, Vladimir B. Bajic
APBC2
2005 Promoter modeling: the case study of mammalian histone promoters
abstract
MOTIVATION: Histone proteins play important roles in chromosomal functions. They are significantly evolutionarily conserved across species, which suggests similarity in their transcription regulation. The abundance of experimental data on histone promoters provides an excellent background for the evaluation of computational methods. Our study addresses the issue of how well computational analysis can contribute to unveiling the biologically relevant content of promoter regions for a large number of mammalian histone genes taken across several species, and suggests the consensus promoter models of different histone groups. RESULTS: This is the first study to unveil the detailed promoter structures of all five mammalian histone groups and their subgroups. This is also the most comprehensive computational analysis of histone promoters performed to date. The most exciting fact is that the results correlate very well with the biologically known facts and experimental data. Our analysis convincingly demonstrates that computational approach can significantly contribute to elucidation of promoter content (identification of biologically relevant signals) complementing tedious wet-lab experiments. We believe that this type of analysis can be easily applied to other functional gene classes, thus providing a general framework for modelling promoter groups. These results also provide the basis to hunt for genes co-regulated with histone genes across mammalian genomes.
Rajesh Chowdhary, R. Ayesha Ali, Werner Albig, Detlef Doenecke, Vladimir B. Bajic
Bioinform.2