Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Doug Fieg
dblp:33/1883
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
2 papers |
Routing and switching · 57% Wireless networking · 37% Network performance modeling · 6% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Routing and switching
multicast routing |
0.0 | 2 | 1997 | Performance and Resource Cost Comparisons for the CBT and PIM Multicast Routing Protocols · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1997 Performance and Resource Cost Comparisons for the CBT and PIM Multicast Routing Protocols in DIS Environments · INFOCOM 1996 |
Wireless networking › interference modeling
SINR model |
0.0 | 2 | 1997 | Performance and Resource Cost Comparisons for the CBT and PIM Multicast Routing Protocols · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1997 Performance and Resource Cost Comparisons for the CBT and PIM Multicast Routing Protocols in DIS Environments · INFOCOM 1996 |
Routing and switching › multicast routing
core-based trees |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Performance and Resource Cost Comparisons for the CBT and PIM Multicast Routing Protocols · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1997 |
Network performance modeling › protocol performance analysis
routing protocol comparison |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Performance and Resource Cost Comparisons for the CBT and PIM Multicast Routing Protocols · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1997 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › communication system simulation
network simulation |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Performance and Resource Cost Comparisons for the CBT and PIM Multicast Routing Protocols in DIS Environments · INFOCOM 1996 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › network performance analysis
protocol performance comparison |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Performance and Resource Cost Comparisons for the CBT and PIM Multicast Routing Protocols in DIS Environments · INFOCOM 1996 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
queueing analysis · 0.0network simulation · 0.0simulation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | Performance and Resource Cost Comparisons for the CBT and PIM Multicast Routing ProtocolsabstractResearchers have proposed the core-based trees (CBTs) and protocol independent multicasting (PIM) protocols to route multicast data an internetworks. We compare the simulated performance of CBT and PIM using the OPNET network simulation tool. Performance metrics include end-to-end delay, network resource usage, join time, the size of the tables containing multicast routing information, and the impact of the timers introduced by the protocols. We also offer suggestions to improve PIM sparse mode while retaining the ability to offer both shared tree and source-based tree routing. Tom Billhartz, J. Bibb Cain, Ellen Farrey-Goudreau, Doug Fieg, Stephen G. Batsell |
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. | 4 |
| 1996 | Performance and Resource Cost Comparisons for the CBT and PIM Multicast Routing Protocols in DIS EnvironmentsabstractResearchers have proposed the core based trees (CBT) and protocol independent multicasting (PIM) protocols to route multicast data on internetworks. The performance of these protocols is examined in the distributed interactive simulation (DIS) environment using the OPNET network simulation tool. The simulation results provide measures of important performance metrics including end-to-end delay, network resource usage, and join time. The size of the tables containing multicast routing information and the impact of the timers introduced by the protocols are also examined. Suggestions are offered to improve PIM Sparse while retaining the ability to offer both shared tree and source-based tree routing. Tom Billhartz, J. Bibb Cain, Ellen Farrey-Goudreau, Doug Fieg, Stephen G. Batsell |
INFOCOM | 4 |