EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrei Tchaltsev
dblp:33/1919
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3Theory of computation · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 50% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 50% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Embedded and real-time systems · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Embedded and real-time systems
cyber-physical system platforms |
0.2 | 2 | 2012 | A Comprehensive Approach to On-Board Autonomy Verification and Validation · IJCAI 2011 Formal Verification and Validation of ERTMS Industrial Railway Train Spacing System · CAV 2012 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
model-based reasoning |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | A Comprehensive Approach to On-Board Autonomy Verification and Validation · IJCAI 2011 |
Requirements engineering and software design › requirements analysis
formal requirements analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | RAT: A Tool for the Formal Analysis of Requirements · CAV 2007 |
Requirements engineering and software design
requirements analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | RAT: A Tool for the Formal Analysis of Requirements · CAV 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
model-based reasoning · 0.2fault detection and recovery · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Formal Verification and Validation of ERTMS Industrial Railway Train Spacing System
Alessandro Cimatti, Raffaele Corvino, Armando Lazzaro, Iman Narasamdya, Tiziana Rizzo, Marco Roveri, Angela Sanseviero, Andrei Tchaltsev |
CAV | 8 |
| 2011 | A Comprehensive Approach to On-Board Autonomy Verification and ValidationabstractDeep space missions are characterized by severely constrained communication links and often require intervention from Ground to overcome the difficulties encountered during the mission. An adequate Ground control could be compromised due to communication delays and required Ground decision-making time, endangering the system, although safing procedures are strictly adhered to. To meet the needs of future missions and increase their scientific return, space systems will require an increased level of autonomy on-board. We propose a comprehensive approach to on-board autonomy relying on model-based reasoning. This approach encompasses in a uniform formal framework many important reasoning capabilities needed to achieve autonomy (such as plan generation, plan validation, plan execution and monitoring, fault detection identification and recovery, run-time diagnosis, and model validation). The controlled platform is represented symbolically, and the reasoning capabilities are seen as symbolic manipulation of such formal model. In this approach we separate out the discrete control parts and the continuous parts of the domain model (e.g., resources such as the power consumed or produced and the data acquired during an execution of a certain action) to facilitate the deliberative actions. The continuous part is associated to the discrete part by means of the resource estimation functions, that are taken into account while validating the generated plan and while monitoring the execution of the current plan. We have developed a prototype of this framework and we have plugged it within an Autonomous Reasoning Engine. This engine has been evaluated on two case studies inspired by real-world ongoing projects: a planetary rover and an orbiting spacecraft. We have performed a characterization of the approach in terms of reliability, availability and performances both on a desktop platform and on a spacecraft simulator. Marco Bozzano, Alessandro Cimatti, Marco Roveri, Andrei Tchaltsev |
IJCAI | 4 |
| 2008 | Diagnostic Information for Realizability
Alessandro Cimatti, Marco Roveri, Viktor Schuppan, Andrei Tchaltsev |
VMCAI | 4 |
| 2007 | RAT: A Tool for the Formal Analysis of Requirements
Roderick Bloem, Roberto Cavada, Ingo Pill, Marco Roveri, Andrei Tchaltsev |
CAV | 5 |