Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nigel Duffy

dblp:33/2011 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
0000-0003-2663-1647ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 41% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 34% Language models and text generation · 14%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 50% Mathematical optimization · 50%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
named entity recognition
0.012002
New Ranking Algorithms for Parsing and Tagging: Kernels over Discrete Structures, and the Voted Perceptron · ACL 2002
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
reranking
0.012002
New Ranking Algorithms for Parsing and Tagging: Kernels over Discrete Structures, and the Voted Perceptron · ACL 2002
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
statistical parsing
0.012002
New Ranking Algorithms for Parsing and Tagging: Kernels over Discrete Structures, and the Voted Perceptron · ACL 2002
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods
0.012001
Convolution Kernels for Natural Language · NIPS 2001
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.012001
Convolution Kernels for Natural Language · NIPS 2001
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel function
tree kernel
0.012001
Convolution Kernels for Natural Language · NIPS 2001
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
regression
0.012000
Leveraging for Regression · COLT 2000
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational oncology
cancer classification from gene expression
0.012000
Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data · Bioinform. 2000
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
boosting
0.011999
Potential Boosters? · NIPS 1999
Bioinformatics and computational biology
feature selection
0.012000
Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data · Bioinform. 2000
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.012000
Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data · Bioinform. 2000
Mathematical optimization
importance sampling
0.012000
Leveraging for Regression · COLT 2000
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms
sampling
0.012000
Leveraging for Regression · COLT 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

voted perceptron · 0.1sampling · 0.1leveraging scores · 0.1tree kernel · 0.0convolution kernel · 0.0support vector machine · 0.0machine learning classification · 0.0boosting · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 New Ranking Algorithms for Parsing and Tagging: Kernels over Discrete Structures, and the Voted Perceptron
abstract
This paper introduces new learning algorithms for natural language processing based on the perceptron algorithm. We show how the algorithms can be efficiently applied to exponential sized representations of parse trees, such as the "all subtrees" (DOP) representation described by (Bod 1998), or a representation tracking all sub-fragments of a tagged sentence. We give experimental results showing significant improvements on two tasks: parsing Wall Street Journal text, and named-entity extraction from web data.
Michael Collins 0001, Nigel Duffy
ACL2
2002 Boosting Methods for Regression
Nigel Duffy, David P. Helmbold
Mach. Learn.1
2002 A geometric approach to leveraging weak learners
Nigel Duffy, David P. Helmbold
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
2001 Convolution Kernels for Natural Language
abstract
We describe the application of kernel methods to Natural Language Pro- cessing (NLP) problems. In many NLP tasks the objects being modeled are strings, trees, graphs or other discrete structures which require some mechanism to convert them into feature vectors. We describe kernels for various natural language structures, allowing rich, high dimensional rep- resentations of these structures. We show how a kernel over trees can be applied to parsing using the voted perceptron algorithm, and we give experimental results on the ATIS corpus of parse trees.
Michael Collins 0001, Nigel Duffy
NIPS2
2000 Leveraging for Regression
Nigel Duffy, David P. Helmbold
COLT1
2000 Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data
abstract
MOTIVATION: DNA microarray experiments generating thousands of gene expression measurements, are being used to gather information from tissue and cell samples regarding gene expression differences that will be useful in diagnosing disease. We have developed a new method to analyse this kind of data using support vector machines (SVMs). This analysis consists of both classification of the tissue samples, and an exploration of the data for mis-labeled or questionable tissue results. RESULTS: We demonstrate the method in detail on samples consisting of ovarian cancer tissues, normal ovarian tissues, and other normal tissues. The dataset consists of expression experiment results for 97,802 cDNAs for each tissue. As a result of computational analysis, a tissue sample is discovered and confirmed to be wrongly labeled. Upon correction of this mistake and the removal of an outlier, perfect classification of tissues is achieved, but not with high confidence. We identify and analyse a subset of genes from the ovarian dataset whose expression is highly differentiated between the types of tissues. To show robustness of the SVM method, two previously published datasets from other types of tissues or cells are analysed. The results are comparable to those previously obtained. We show that other machine learning methods also perform comparably to the SVM on many of those datasets. AVAILABILITY: The SVM software is available at http://www.cs. columbia.edu/ approximately bgrundy/svm.
Terrence S. Furey, Nello Cristianini, Nigel Duffy, David W. Bednarski, Michèl Schummer, David Haussler
Bioinform.3
1999 Using multiplicative algorithms to build cascade correlation networks
abstract
Cascade correlation has been shown to learn effectively, producing small networks and low generalization error. However, there remain difficulties with this approach. Cascade correlation can produce networks with large depth and large fan-in. We propose the use of a multiplicative learning algorithm to address these problems. Experimental results indicate that these algorithms may produce sparse weight vectors. Furthermore, theoretical results indicate that these algorithms behave substantially differently from the usual additive algorithms such as gradient descent and Quickprop. It is hoped that by combining these two approaches an effective neural network algorithm will result. We attempt to validate this and motivate further research.
Nigel Duffy
IJCNN1
1999 Potential Boosters?
Nigel Duffy, David P. Helmbold
NIPS1