Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lennart Meier

dblp:33/2307 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 5 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
4 papers
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Distributed systems · 91% Embedded and real-time systems · 9%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network
0.122005
Brief announcement: gradient clock synchronization in sensor networks · PODC 2005
Scalable topology control for deployment-support networks · IPSN 2005
Internet of things and sensor networks
time synchronization
0.122005
Brief announcement: gradient clock synchronization in sensor networks · PODC 2005
Improved interval-based clock synchronization in sensor networks · IPSN 2004
Distributed systems
distributed coordination
0.122005
Brief announcement: gradient clock synchronization in sensor networks · PODC 2005
Improved interval-based clock synchronization in sensor networks · IPSN 2004
Internet of things and sensor networks
topology control
0.112005
Scalable topology control for deployment-support networks · IPSN 2005
Distributed systems › clock synchronization
gradient clock synchronization
0.112005
Brief announcement: gradient clock synchronization in sensor networks · PODC 2005
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
sensor deployment
0.012004
Next-generation prototyping of sensor networks · SenSys 2004
Distributed systems
clock synchronization
0.012004
Improved interval-based clock synchronization in sensor networks · IPSN 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

worst-case optimality analysis · 0.1drift diversity modeling · 0.1topology maintenance · 0.1scatternet formation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Scalable topology control for deployment-support networks
abstract
Deployment-support networks (DSNs) have been proposed as a novel tool for the development, test, deployment, and validation of wireless sensor networks. They are expected to enhance scalability and flexibility in deployment by eliminating cable connections. In this paper, we describe our implementation of a DSN, giving details on the algorithms for topology control and maintenance. We provide various measurements of DSNs spanning up to 71 BTnode rev3 devices, featuring the largest Bluetooth scatternet reported to date. We also discuss our experience gained in the development and experimentation. Our results strongly suggest that our implementation scales well to a large number of nodes.
Jan Beutel, Matthias Dyer, Lennart Meier, Lothar Thiele
IPSN3
2005 Interval-based clock synchronization is resilient to mobility
abstract
Clock synchronization is a crucial basic service in ad-hoc sensor networks. Most proposed algorithms employ hierarchical communication structures that may be expensive to maintain when nodes are mobile and network topologies are dynamic. Interval-based synchronization has been proposed as particularly suited for sensor networks, as it does not require any particular communication pattern. In this paper, we show that node mobility puts no burden on interval-based synchronization, but actually helps it. This is not the case for time-estimate-based approaches that rely on specific communication patterns. Mobility resilience therefore further strengthens the case of interval-based clock synchronization for ad-hoc sensor networks
Lennart Meier, Philipp Blum, Lothar Thiele
MASS1
2005 Brief announcement: gradient clock synchronization in sensor networks
Lennart Meier, Lothar Thiele
PODC1
2004 Improved interval-based clock synchronization in sensor networks
abstract
Interval-based synchronization provides the nodes of a distributed system with guaranteed bounds on a common time. This is a crucial piece of infrastructure in many distributed sensing and actuating systems. In this paper, we propose a modification to a known interval-based synchronization algorithm; our new algorithm obtains substantially better results in sensor-network scenarios by taking advantage of the typical drift diversity of the nodes' clocks. We propose a model for synchronization in ad-hoc, sporadic-communication scenarios. The model allows us to identify the worst and the best case in terms of achievable time uncertainty and to show the worst-case optimality of the discussed algorithms. Simulations show that in the average case, our modification significantly reduces the time uncertainty.
Philipp Blum, Lennart Meier, Lothar Thiele
IPSN2
2004 Internal synchronization of drift-constraint clocks in ad-hoc sensor networks
abstract
Clock synchronization is a crucial basic service in typical sensor networks, since the observations of distributed sensors more often than not need to be ordered ("a happened before b") or otherwise related ("a and b happened within a time window of size x") in time. Ad-hoc networks may exhibit characteristics which make the use of traditional clock-synchronization algorithms infeasible. Recently, algorithms suitable for ad-hoc networks have been presented.We first propose an improvement to an existing algorithm. While needing less computation and no more communication or memory than the original algorithm, our new algorithm always yields equal or better results and thus outperforms the original algorithm. We then examine how even better synchronization can be obtained, possibly at the cost of additional computation, communication, and memory. To this end, we introduce a model for internal synchronization. This model allows us to find an algorithm which makes use of all the data a node can obtain from the network for a given communication pattern and thus provides optimal synchronization in our model.
Lennart Meier, Philipp Blum, Lothar Thiele
MobiHoc1
2004 Next-generation prototyping of sensor networks
abstract
Large-scale deployment of sensor networks is more and more becoming an issue to researchers and industry alike. The recently revised BTnode architecture provides two wireless radios and facilitates the interconnection of heterogeneous devices. Apart from offering interesting new opportunities in using multi-frontend devices in sensor-network research, this architecture is optimally suited for deployment-support networks as introduced in the following.
Jan Beutel, Matthias Dyer, Martin Hinz, Lennart Meier, Matthias Ringwald
SenSys4