EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Christopher A. Stein
dblp:33/2315
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Storage systems · 76% Memory systems · 24% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Operating systems · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Authentication and access control · 50% Systems and software security · 50% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Content delivery and video streaming · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Operating systems › resource management › storage management
file systems |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Unifying File System Protection · USENIX ATC, General Track 2001 |
Operating systems › resource management › storage management › file systems
file system security |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Unifying File System Protection · USENIX ATC, General Track 2001 |
Memory systems › cache management › in-network caching
proxy caching |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Storage Management for Web Proxies · USENIX ATC, General Track 2001 |
Storage systems
file systems |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Journaling Versus Soft Updates: Asynchronous Meta-data Protection in File Systems · USENIX ATC, General Track 2000 |
Storage systems › file systems
journaling file system |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Journaling Versus Soft Updates: Asynchronous Meta-data Protection in File Systems · USENIX ATC, General Track 2000 |
Storage systems › file systems
soft updates |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Journaling Versus Soft Updates: Asynchronous Meta-data Protection in File Systems · USENIX ATC, General Track 2000 |
Authentication and access control
access control |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Unifying File System Protection · USENIX ATC, General Track 2001 |
Systems and software security
file system security |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Unifying File System Protection · USENIX ATC, General Track 2001 |
Storage systems › metadata management
metadata protection |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Journaling Versus Soft Updates: Asynchronous Meta-data Protection in File Systems · USENIX ATC, General Track 2000 |
Storage systems
storage reliability |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Journaling Versus Soft Updates: Asynchronous Meta-data Protection in File Systems · USENIX ATC, General Track 2000 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
cache management · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | Building a Reliable Mutable File System on Peer-to-Peer StorageabstractThis paper sketches the design of the Eliot File System (Eliot), a mutable file system that maintains the pure immutability of its peer-to-peer (P2P) substrate by isolating mutation in an auxiliary metadata service. The immutability of address-to-content bindings has several advantages in P2P systems. However mutable file systems are desirable because they allow clients to update existing files; a necessary property for many applications. In order to facilitate modifications, the file system must provide some atom of mutability. Since this atom of mutability is a fundamental characteristic of the file system and not the underlying storage substrate, it is a mistake to violate the integrity of the substrate with special cases for mutability. Instead, Eliot employs a separate, generalized metadata service that isolates all mutation and client state in an auxiliary replicated database. Eliot provides fine-granularity file updates with either AFS open-close or NFS-like consistency semantics. Eliot builds a mutable filesystem on a global resource bed of purely immutable P2P block storage. Christopher A. Stein, Michael J. Tucker, Margo I. Seltzer |
SRDS | 1 |
| 2001 | Research Issues in No-Futz ComputingabstractAt the 1999 Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems (HotOS VII), the attendees reached consensus that the most important issue facing the OS research community was "No-Futz" computing; eliminating the ongoing "futzing" that characterizes most systems today. To date, little research has been accomplished in this area. Our goal in this paper is to focus the research community on the challenges we face if we are to design systems that are truly futz-free, or even low-futz. David A. Holland, William K. Josephson, Kostas Magoutis, Margo I. Seltzer, Christopher A. Stein, Ada T. Lim |
HotOS | 5 |
| 2001 | Storage Management for Web Proxies
Elizabeth A. M. Shriver, Eran Gabber, Christopher A. Stein |
USENIX ATC, General Track | 4 |
| 2001 | Unifying File System Protection
Christopher A. Stein, John H. Howard, Margo I. Seltzer |
USENIX ATC, General Track | 1 |
| 2000 | Journaling Versus Soft Updates: Asynchronous Meta-data Protection in File Systems
Margo I. Seltzer, Gregory R. Ganger, Marshall K. McKusick, Keith A. Smith, Craig A. N. Soules, Christopher A. Stein |
USENIX ATC, General Track | 6 |