Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rui Lu 0002
dblp:33/2451-2
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0004-5745-6305ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 54% Reinforcement learning · 41% Learning paradigms · 5% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | TreeRL: LLM Reinforcement Learning with On-Policy Tree Search · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning for NLP
reinforcement learning for language models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | T1: Advancing Language Model Reasoning through Reinforcement Learning and Inference Scaling · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
test-time scaling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | T1: Advancing Language Model Reasoning through Reinforcement Learning and Inference Scaling · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning
tree search in reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | TreeRL: LLM Reinforcement Learning with On-Policy Tree Search · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | T1: Advancing Language Model Reasoning through Reinforcement Learning and Inference Scaling · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › data balancing
oversampling |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | T1: Advancing Language Model Reasoning through Reinforcement Learning and Inference Scaling · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tree search · 0.9reinforcement learning · 0.9process reward · 0.9on-policy reinforcement learning · 0.9imitation learning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | TreeRL: LLM Reinforcement Learning with On-Policy Tree SearchabstractReinforcement learning (RL) with tree search has demonstrated superior performance in traditional reasoning tasks.Compared to conventional independent chain sampling strategies with outcome supervision, tree search enables better exploration of the reasoning space and provides dense, on-policy process rewards during RL training but remains under-explored in On-Policy LLM RL.We propose TreeRL, a reinforcement learning framework that directly incorporates on-policy tree search for RL training.Our approach includes intermediate supervision and eliminates the need for separate reward model training.Existing approaches typically train a separate process reward model, which can suffer from distribution mismatch and reward hacking.We also introduce a cost-effective tree search approach that achieves higher search efficiency under the same generation token budget by strategically branching from high-uncertainty intermediate steps rather than using random branching.Experiments on challenging math and code reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that TreeRL achieves superior performance compared to traditional ChainRL, highlighting the potential of tree search for LLM. Ziniu Hu, Yujiang Li, Rui Lu 0002, Jie Tang 0001, Yuxiao Dong |
ACL (1) | 4 |
| 2025 | T1: Advancing Language Model Reasoning through Reinforcement Learning and Inference ScalingabstractLarge language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex reasoning tasks. However, existing approaches mainly rely on imitation learning and struggle to achieve effective test-time scaling. While reinforcement learning (RL) holds promise for enabling self-exploration, recent attempts yield modest improvements in complex reasoning. In this paper, we present T1 to scale RL by encouraging exploration and understand inference scaling. We first initialize the LLM using synthesized chain-of-thought data that integrates trial-and-error and self-verification. To scale RL training, we promote increased sampling diversity through over-sampling. We demonstrate that T1 with open LLMs as its base exhibits inference scaling behavior and achieves superior performance on challenging math reasoning benchmarks. More importantly, we present a simple strategy to examine inference scaling, where increased inference budgets directly lead to T1’s better performance without any additional verification. The model weights and training data are publicly available at https://github.com/THUDM/T1. Rui Lu 0002, Yujiang Li, Zijun Yao 0002, Juan-Zi Li, Jie Tang 0001, Yuxiao Dong |
ICML | 3 |