Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Robert Reuse
dblp:33/2465
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | A Novel Approach to Random Pattern Testing of Sequential Circuits · IEEE Trans. Computers 1998 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
random testing |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | A Novel Approach to Random Pattern Testing of Sequential Circuits · IEEE Trans. Computers 1998 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
sequential circuit testing |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | A Novel Approach to Random Pattern Testing of Sequential Circuits · IEEE Trans. Computers 1998 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
testability analysis · 0.0partial scan · 0.0holding random vectors · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | A Novel Approach to Random Pattern Testing of Sequential CircuitsabstractRandom pattern testing methods are known to result in poor fault coverage for most sequential circuits unless costly circuit modifications are made. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to improve the random pattern testability of sequential circuits. We introduce the concept of holding signals at primary inputs and scan flipflops of a partially scanned sequential circuit for a certain length of time, instead of applying a new random vector at each clock cycle. When a random vector is held at the primary inputs of the circuit under test or at the scan flip-flops, the system clock is applied and the primary outputs of the circuit are observed. Information obtained from a testability analysis or test generator is used to determine the number of clock cycles for which each random vector is to be held constant. The method is low cost and the results of our experiment on the benchmark circuits show that it is very effective in providing fault coverage close to the maximum obtainable fault coverage using random patterns with full scan. Lama Nachman, Kewal K. Saluja, Shambhu J. Upadhyaya, Robert Reuse |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 4 |