Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Eui Joung Joung

dblp:33/2626 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Storage systems · 64% Distributed systems · 28% Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 8%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems
fault tolerance		 0.012001
Reliability and performance of hierarchical RAID with multiple controllers · PODC 2001
Storage systems › storage reliability
RAID		 0.012001
Reliability and performance of hierarchical RAID with multiple controllers · PODC 2001
Storage systems
storage reliability		 0.012001
Reliability and performance of hierarchical RAID with multiple controllers · PODC 2001
Storage systems › storage reliability
mean time to data loss		 0.012001
Reliability and performance of hierarchical RAID with multiple controllers · PODC 2001
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
reliability modeling		 0.012001
Reliability and performance of hierarchical RAID with multiple controllers · PODC 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

markov process · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 Reliability and performance of hierarchical RAID with multiple controllers
abstract
Redundant arrays of inexpensive disks (RAID) offer fault tolerance against disk failures. However a storage system having more disks suffers from less reliability and performance. A RAID architecture tolerating multiple disk failures shows severe performance degradation in comparison to the RAID Level 5 due to the complexity of implementation. We present a new RAID architecture that tolerates at least three disk failures and offers similar throughout to the RAID Level 5. We call it the hierarchical RAID, which is hierarchically composed of RAID Levels. Furthermore, we formally introduce the mean-time-to-data-loss (MTTDL) of traditional RAID and the hierarchical RAID using Markov process for detailed comparison.
Sung Hoon Baek, Bong Wan Kim, Eui Joung Joung, Chong-Won Park
 PODC3