Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Harry Rudin

dblp:33/4000 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
30ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 29 · 6 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
6 papers
Network management and operations · 56% Network performance modeling · 16% Routing and switching · 15%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network management and operations › protocol verification
protocol validation
0.031982
Using Automated Validation Techniques to Detect Lockups in Packet-Switched Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1982
A Validation Technique for Tightly Coupled Protocols · IEEE Trans. Computers 1982
Towards Analyzing and Synthesizing Protocols · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1980
Network management and operations › fault management
fault diagnosis
0.011982
Using Automated Validation Techniques to Detect Lockups in Packet-Switched Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1982
Network management and operations
network verification
0.011982
Using Automated Validation Techniques to Detect Lockups in Packet-Switched Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1982
Internet architecture and protocols › protocol design
protocol synthesis
0.011980
Towards Analyzing and Synthesizing Protocols · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1980
Network management and operations
protocol verification
0.011980
Towards Analyzing and Synthesizing Protocols · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1980
Network performance modeling
queueing analysis
0.021976
On Routing and "Delta Routing": A Taxonomy and Performance Comparison of Techniques for Packet-Switched Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1976
Note on Inherent and Imposed Priorities in Packet Switching · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1974
Routing and switching
adaptive routing
0.011976
On Routing and "Delta Routing": A Taxonomy and Performance Comparison of Techniques for Packet-Switched Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1976
Network performance modeling
delay performance
0.011976
On Routing and "Delta Routing": A Taxonomy and Performance Comparison of Techniques for Packet-Switched Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1976
Routing and switching
routing
0.011976
On Routing and "Delta Routing": A Taxonomy and Performance Comparison of Techniques for Packet-Switched Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1976
Network performance modeling › queueing analysis
message delay
0.011974
Note on Inherent and Imposed Priorities in Packet Switching · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1974
Routing and switching › packet switching
packet-switched networks
0.011982
Using Automated Validation Techniques to Detect Lockups in Packet-Switched Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1982
Routing and switching
packet switching
0.011974
Note on Inherent and Imposed Priorities in Packet Switching · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1974
Internet architecture and protocols › packet scheduling
priority scheduling
0.011974
Note on Inherent and Imposed Priorities in Packet Switching · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1974
Internet architecture and protocols
protocol design
0.011980
Towards Analyzing and Synthesizing Protocols · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1980

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

automated protocol validation · 0.0syntax analysis · 0.0reachability analysis · 0.0production rules · 0.0perturbation technique · 0.0automated validation · 0.0taxonomy · 0.0simulation · 0.0queueing analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Computer Networks (COMNET) Editorial for 2018
Ian F. Akyildiz, Harry Rudin, Burkhard Stiller
Comput. Networks2
2018 Editorial for COMNET 2017
Ian F. Akyildiz, Harry Rudin, Burkhard Stiller
Comput. Networks2
2017 Change at the Helm Welcome, Farewell, Advice, Thanks Special Issues
Harry Rudin
Comput. Networks1
2016 Comnet Editorial for 2015
Ian F. Akyildiz, Harry Rudin
Comput. Networks2
2014 Editorial
Ian F. Akyildiz, Harry Rudin
Comput. Networks2
2013 COMNET editorial for 2012
Ian F. Akyildiz, Harry Rudin
Comput. Networks2
2012 Editorial
Ian F. Akyildiz, Harry Rudin
Comput. Networks2
2012 The WEB we live in
Dirk Husemann, Harry Rudin
Comput. Networks2
2011 Editorial
Ian F. Akyildiz, Harry Rudin
Comput. Networks2
2010 Editorial
Ian F. Akyildiz, Harry Rudin
Comput. Networks2
2009 Editorial
Ian F. Akyildiz, Harry Rudin
Comput. Networks2
2008 Editorial
Ian F. Akyildiz, Harry Rudin
Comput. Networks2
2007 Editorial
Ian F. Akyildiz, Harry Rudin
Comput. Networks2
2006 Editorial
Ian F. Akyildiz, Harry Rudin
Comput. Networks2
2004 Editorial
Ian F. Akyildiz, Harry Rudin
Comput. Networks2
2003 Editorial
Ian F. Akyildiz, Harry Rudin
Comput. Networks2
2000 Editorial
Ian F. Akyildiz, Harry Rudin
Comput. Networks2
1997 Archiving agents for the World Wide Web
abstract
The information available on the World Wide Web changes with incredible speed. New information is added and old information is altered. This means that a document which is important to a user accessing the Web may change, move or even disappear altogether. Described here is an autonomous agent, written in Java, which locally archives documents that are deemed important by the user. These locally archived documents are then available-quickly-when needed.
Christoph Braendli, Harry Rudin
ICCCN2
1997 Challenges to the network: Telecoms and the internet
Harry Rudin
Comput. Networks ISDN Syst.1
1996 Formal Methods after 15 Years: Status and Trends (Paper based on contributions of the panelists at the FORmal TEchnique '95, Conference, Montreal, October 1995)
Jean-Pierre Courtiat, Piotr Dembinski, Gerard J. Holzmann, Luigi Logrippo, Harry Rudin, Pamela Zave
Comput. Networks ISDN Syst.5
1994 Media-Access Techniques for High-Speed LANs and MANs
Harmen R. van As, Harry Rudin
Comput. Networks ISDN Syst.2
1992 The ATM-Asynchronous Transfer Mode
Harry Rudin
Comput. Networks ISDN Syst.1
1982 A Validation Technique for Tightly Coupled Protocols
abstract
For several years the authors have been part of an effort developing automated techniques for examining the syntax of protocols for the absence of various errors. Recently, we have turned our attention to trying to prove various functional properties of protocols used in ring-topology systems. Ring systems have a number of properties that distinguish them from the more general computer networks towards which our earlier validation work was directed. We report here on the resulting changes in the protocol models and validation techniques, together with extensions used to prove that the protocol being examined has the various desirable functional properties demanded of it.
Harry Rudin, Colin H. West
IEEE Trans. Computers1
1982 Using Automated Validation Techniques to Detect Lockups in Packet-Switched Networks
abstract
The existence of a program for automatically examining the syntax of a protocol for the absence of various undesired properties-such as deadlock-raises the question whether the classical `lockups' described in the early packet-switched data network literature could be detected by such a program. The authors answer this question in the affirmative.
Mark Sherman 0001, Harry Rudin
IEEE Trans. Commun.2
1981 Congestion Control: Preview and Some Comments
Harry Rudin
IEEE Trans. Commun.1
1980 Towards Analyzing and Synthesizing Protocols
abstract
The production of error-free protocols or complex process interactions is essential to reliable communications. This paper presents techniques for both the detection of errors in protocols and for prevention of errors in their design. The methods have been used successfully to detect and correct errors in existing protocols. A technique based on a reachability analysis is described which detects errors m a design. This "perturbation technique" has been implemented and has successfully detected inconsistencies or errors in existing protocol designs including both X.21 and X.25. The types of errors handled are state deadlocks, unspecified receptions, nonexecutable interactions, and state smbiguities. These errors are discussed and their effects considered. An interactive design technique is then described that prevents design errors. The technique is based on a set of production rules which guarantee that complete reception capability is provided in the interacting processes. These rules have been implemented in the form of a tracking algorithm that prevents a designer from creating unspecified receptions and nonexecutable interactions and monitors for the presence of state deadlocks and ambiguities.
Pitro Zafiropulo, Colin H. West, Harry Rudin, D. D. Cowan, Daniel Brand
IEEE Trans. Commun.3
1978 Packet and Circuit Switching: Cost/Performance Boundaries
Karl Kümmerle, Harry Rudin
Comput. Networks2
1978 Automated Protocol Validation: One Chain of Development
Harry Rudin, Colin H. West, Pitro Zafiropulo
Comput. Networks1
1976 On Routing and "Delta Routing": A Taxonomy and Performance Comparison of Techniques for Packet-Switched Networks
abstract
An inherent capability of packet-switched networks is the speed at which they can be reconfigured; various dynamic or adaptive routing techniques have been conceived to exploit this capability. In this study, existing techniques are described and an "ultra-dynamic" technique, delta routing, is invented. Several promising techniques are then selected for comparison with one another and with a network's ultimate carrying capacity. The goal is to shed light on the questions if and when one should use which kind of adaptive routing. First, a taxonomy of routing strategies is presented. In addition to delta routing, random, proportional, shortest path, and shortest path fixed-for-session duration are selected for comparison and their mechanisms described. The delay and efficiency performance of the five techniques are then compared with one another and with ideal behavior via simulations. These have been carried out concentrating on four very small networks, each with very different characteristics with the intention of gaining insight into the strengths and weaknesses of the various techniques. A ten-node network has also been simulated. The results favor delta routing which is most effective in highly interconnected network enviroments.
Harry Rudin
IEEE Trans. Commun.1
1974 Note on Inherent and Imposed Priorities in Packet Switching
abstract
When messages are transmitted as a series of possibly noncontiguous packets, an effective priority is introduced which favors short messages. The strength of this effect upon transmission time is investigated and compared with schemes where an additional priority scheme is imposed. It is found that imposing a real priority structure can markedly influence delays when: first, the trunks are relatively heavily loaded, and second, the nodes' incoming traffic arrives over high-speed channels.
Milo McDonald, Harry Rudin
IEEE Trans. Commun.2