Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Virginia A. Peck

dblp:33/4169 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Usability and user experience research · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Usability and user experience research › cognitive modeling
cognitive models of interaction
0.011992
Browser-Soar: A Computational Model of a Highly Interactive Task · CHI 1992
Usability and user experience research › human performance modeling
GOMS modeling
0.011992
Browser-Soar: A Computational Model of a Highly Interactive Task · CHI 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

computational cognitive model · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1992 Browser-Soar: A Computational Model of a Highly Interactive Task
abstract
Browser-Soar models the perceptual, cognitive, and motor operators of a user searching for information in an on-line help browser. The model accounts for 90% of the browsing behavior observed in ten episodes. This result suggests that much of browsing behavior is a routine cognitive task, describably by GOMS, and extends the boundary of tasks to which GOMS applies to include highly interactive tasks. Further, it also suggests that GOMS analyses can be used to evaluate text-editors and other computer applications, and to help focus design effort.
Virginia A. Peck, Bonnie E. John
CHI1