Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Derek Justice
dblp:33/4693
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 67% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 33% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Network measurement and analytics · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Graph data management · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Network measurement and analytics › network tomography
topology inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Estimation of message source and destination from network intercepts · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2006 |
Mathematical optimization › integer programming › binary optimization
binary linear programming |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A Binary Linear Programming Formulation of the Graph Edit Distance · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A Binary Linear Programming Formulation of the Graph Edit Distance · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory › graph similarity
graph edit distance |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A Binary Linear Programming Formulation of the Graph Edit Distance · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006 |
Graph data management
graph matching |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | A Binary Linear Programming Formulation of the Graph Edit Distance · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
linear programming relaxation · 0.1branch-and-bound · 0.1assignment problem · 0.1semidefinite programming relaxation · 0.1monte carlo approximation · 0.1maximum a posteriori estimation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | A Binary Linear Programming Formulation of the Graph Edit DistanceabstractA binary linear programming formulation of the graph edit distance for unweighted, undirected graphs with vertex attributes is derived and applied to a graph recognition problem. A general formulation for editing graphs is used to derive a graph edit distance that is proven to be a metric, provided the cost function for individual edit operations is a metric. Then, a binary linear program is developed for computing this graph edit distance, and polynomial time methods for determining upper and lower bounds on the solution of the binary program are derived by applying solution methods for standard linear programming and the assignment problem. A recognition problem of comparing a sample input graph to a database of known prototype graphs in the context of a chemical information system is presented as an application of the new method. The costs associated with various edit operations are chosen by using a minimum normalized variance criterion applied to pairwise distances between nearest neighbors in the database of prototypes. The new metric is shown to perform quite well in comparison to existing metrics when applied to a database of chemical graphs. Derek Justice, Alfred O. Hero III |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2006 | Estimation of message source and destination from network interceptsabstractWe consider the problem of estimating the endpoints (source and destination) of a transmission in a network based on partial measurement of the transmission path. Possibly asynchronous sensors placed at various points within the network provide the basis for endpoint estimation by indicating that a specific transmission has been intercepted at their assigned locations. During a training phase, test transmissions are made between various pairs of endpoints in the network and the sensors they activate are noted. Sensor activations corresponding to transmissions with unknown endpoints are also observed in a monitoring phase. A semidefinite programming relaxation is used in conjunction with the measurements and linear prior information to produce likely sample topologies given the data. These samples are used to generate Monte Carlo approximations of the posterior distributions of source/destination pairs for measurements obtained in the monitoring phase. The posteriors allow for maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation of the endpoints along with computation of some resolution measures. We illustrate the method using simulations of random topologies Derek Justice, Alfred O. Hero III |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 1 |