Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Derek Justice

dblp:33/4693 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 67% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 33%
Computer networks
1 paper
Network measurement and analytics · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Graph data management · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network measurement and analytics › network tomography
topology inference
0.112006
Estimation of message source and destination from network intercepts · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2006
Mathematical optimization › integer programming › binary optimization
binary linear programming
0.112006
A Binary Linear Programming Formulation of the Graph Edit Distance · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization
0.112006
A Binary Linear Programming Formulation of the Graph Edit Distance · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory › graph similarity
graph edit distance
0.112006
A Binary Linear Programming Formulation of the Graph Edit Distance · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006
Graph data management
graph matching
0.012006
A Binary Linear Programming Formulation of the Graph Edit Distance · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

linear programming relaxation · 0.1branch-and-bound · 0.1assignment problem · 0.1semidefinite programming relaxation · 0.1monte carlo approximation · 0.1maximum a posteriori estimation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 A Binary Linear Programming Formulation of the Graph Edit Distance
abstract
A binary linear programming formulation of the graph edit distance for unweighted, undirected graphs with vertex attributes is derived and applied to a graph recognition problem. A general formulation for editing graphs is used to derive a graph edit distance that is proven to be a metric, provided the cost function for individual edit operations is a metric. Then, a binary linear program is developed for computing this graph edit distance, and polynomial time methods for determining upper and lower bounds on the solution of the binary program are derived by applying solution methods for standard linear programming and the assignment problem. A recognition problem of comparing a sample input graph to a database of known prototype graphs in the context of a chemical information system is presented as an application of the new method. The costs associated with various edit operations are chosen by using a minimum normalized variance criterion applied to pairwise distances between nearest neighbors in the database of prototypes. The new metric is shown to perform quite well in comparison to existing metrics when applied to a database of chemical graphs.
Derek Justice, Alfred O. Hero III
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
2006 Estimation of message source and destination from network intercepts
abstract
We consider the problem of estimating the endpoints (source and destination) of a transmission in a network based on partial measurement of the transmission path. Possibly asynchronous sensors placed at various points within the network provide the basis for endpoint estimation by indicating that a specific transmission has been intercepted at their assigned locations. During a training phase, test transmissions are made between various pairs of endpoints in the network and the sensors they activate are noted. Sensor activations corresponding to transmissions with unknown endpoints are also observed in a monitoring phase. A semidefinite programming relaxation is used in conjunction with the measurements and linear prior information to produce likely sample topologies given the data. These samples are used to generate Monte Carlo approximations of the posterior distributions of source/destination pairs for measurements obtained in the monitoring phase. The posteriors allow for maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation of the endpoints along with computation of some resolution measures. We illustrate the method using simulations of random topologies
Derek Justice, Alfred O. Hero III
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.1