Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Joshua W. Robinson

dblp:33/4773 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 50% Computational science and engineering · 50%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › bayesian network
dynamic bayesian network
0.222010
Learning Non-Stationary Dynamic Bayesian Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2010
Non-stationary dynamic Bayesian networks · NIPS 2008
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › structure learning
non-stationary structure learning
0.222010
Learning Non-Stationary Dynamic Bayesian Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2010
Non-stationary dynamic Bayesian networks · NIPS 2008
Computational science and engineering
branching process models
0.112011
A generalized model for multi-marker analysis of cell cycle progression in synchrony experiments · Bioinform. 2011
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
bayesian network
0.112010
Learning Non-Stationary Dynamic Bayesian Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2010
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.112008
Non-stationary dynamic Bayesian networks · NIPS 2008
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
structure learning
0.112008
Non-stationary dynamic Bayesian networks · NIPS 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sampling model · 0.1bayesian inference · 0.1MCMC sampling · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 A generalized model for multi-marker analysis of cell cycle progression in synchrony experiments
abstract
MOTIVATION: To advance understanding of eukaryotic cell division, it is important to observe the process precisely. To this end, researchers monitor changes in dividing cells as they traverse the cell cycle, with the presence or absence of morphological or genetic markers indicating a cell's position in a particular interval of the cell cycle. A wide variety of marker data is available, including information-rich cellular imaging data. However, few formal statistical methods have been developed to use these valuable data sources in estimating how a population of cells progresses through the cell cycle. Furthermore, existing methods are designed to handle only a single binary marker of cell cycle progression at a time. Consequently, they cannot facilitate comparison of experiments involving different sets of markers. RESULTS: Here, we develop a new sampling model to accommodate an arbitrary number of different binary markers that characterize the progression of a population of dividing cells along a branching process. We engineer a strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with fluorescently labeled markers of cell cycle progression, and apply our new model to two image datasets we collected from the strain, as well as an independent dataset of different markers. We use our model to estimate the duration of post-cytokinetic attachment between a S.cerevisiae mother and daughter cell. The Java implementation is fast and extensible, and includes a graphical user interface. Our model provides a powerful and flexible cell cycle analysis tool, suitable to any type or combination of binary markers. AVAILABILITY: The software is available from: http://www.cs.duke.edu/~amink/software/cloccs/. CONTACT: [email protected]; [email protected].
Michael B. Mayhew, Joshua W. Robinson, Boyoun Jung, Steven B. Haase, Alexander J. Hartemink
Bioinform.2
2010 Learning Non-Stationary Dynamic Bayesian Networks
Joshua W. Robinson, Alexander J. Hartemink
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2008 Non-stationary dynamic Bayesian networks
abstract
A principled mechanism for identifying conditional dependencies in time-series data is provided through structure learning of dynamic Bayesian networks (DBNs). An important assumption of DBN structure learning is that the data are generated by a stationary process—an assumption that is not true in many important settings. In this paper, we introduce a new class of graphical models called non-stationary dynamic Bayesian networks, in which the conditional dependence structure of the underlying data-generation process is permitted to change over time. Non-stationary dynamic Bayesian networks represent a new framework for studying problems in which the structure of a network is evolving over time. We define the non-stationary DBN model, present an MCMC sampling algorithm for learning the structure of the model from time-series data under different assumptions, and demonstrate the effectiveness of the algorithm on both simulated and biological data.
Joshua W. Robinson, Alexander J. Hartemink
NIPS1