Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Paul F. Bay

dblp:33/5548 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1986
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 4Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Performance modeling and evaluation · 62% Electronic design automation · 16% Parallel and multicore computing · 16%
Computer networks
2 papers
Transport protocols and congestion control · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation › queueing models
queueing network model
0.021986
Analytic Queueing Network Models for Parallel Processing of Task Systems · IEEE Trans. Computers 1986
Analysis of Queueing Network Models with Population Size Constraints and Delayed Blocked Customers · SIGMETRICS 1984
Electronic design automation › design methodology
hierarchical decomposition
0.011986
Analytic Queueing Network Models for Parallel Processing of Task Systems · IEEE Trans. Computers 1986
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel scheduling
0.011986
Analytic Queueing Network Models for Parallel Processing of Task Systems · IEEE Trans. Computers 1986
Performance modeling and evaluation › queueing models
closed queueing networks
0.011985
Integrated Performance Models for Distributed Processing in Computer Communication Networks · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1985
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models
0.011985
Integrated Performance Models for Distributed Processing in Computer Communication Networks · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1985
Transport protocols and congestion control › flow control
window flow control
0.011984
Performance Analysis of Window Flow Control for Multiple Virtual Routes · INFOCOM 1984
Performance modeling and evaluation › numerical algorithms
decomposition methods
0.011985
Integrated Performance Models for Distributed Processing in Computer Communication Networks · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1985
Transport protocols and congestion control
flow control
0.011984
Performance Analysis of Window Flow Control for Multiple Virtual Routes · INFOCOM 1984

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.0iterative method · 0.0decomposition · 0.0queueing network solver · 0.0markov chain · 0.0queueing analysis · 0.0load concealment · 0.0iterative solution · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1986 Analytic Queueing Network Models for Parallel Processing of Task Systems
abstract
This paper is concerned with the performance evaluation of a realistic model of parallel computations. We present an efficient algorithm to determine the mean completion time and related performance measures for a task system: a set of tasks with precedence relationships in their execution sequence, such that the resulting graph is acyclic. A queueing network (QN) is used to model tasks executing on a single or multicomputer system. In the case of multicomputer systems, we take into account the delay due to interprocess communication. A straight- forward application of a QN solver to the problem is not possible due to variations in the state of the system (composition of tasks in execution). An accurate algorithm based on hierarchical decomposition is presented for solving task systems. At the higher level, the system behavior is specified by a Markov chain whose states correspond to the combination of tasks in execution. The state transition rate matrix for the Markov chain is triangular (since the task system graph was assumed to be acyclic), therefore it can be solved efficiently to compute the state probabilities and the task initiation/completion times. At the lower level, the transition rates among the states of the Markov chain are computed using a QN solver, which determines the throughput of the computer system for each system state. The model and the solution method can be used in performance evaluation of applications exhibiting concurrency in centralized/distributed systems where there are conflicting goals of load balancing and minimizing interprocess communication overhead.
Alexander Thomasian, Paul F. Bay
IEEE Trans. Computers2
1985 Integrated Performance Models for Distributed Processing in Computer Communication Networks
abstract
This paper deals with the analysis of large-scale closed queueing network (QN) models which are used for the performance analysis of computer communication networks (CCN's). The computer systems are interconnected by a wide-area network. Users accessing local/remote computers are affected by the contention (queueing delays) at the computer systems and the communication subnet. The computational cost of analyzing such models increases exponentially with the number of user classes (chains), even when the QN is tractable (product-form). In fact, the submodels of the integrated model are generally not product-form, e.g., due to blocking at computer systems (multiprogramming level constraints) and in the communication subnet (window flow control constraints). Two approximate solution methods are proposed in this paper to analyze the integrated QN model. Both methods use decomposition and iterative techniques to exploit the structure of the QN model such that computational cost is proportional to the number of chains. The accuracy of the solution methods is validated against each other and simulation. The model is used to study the effect that channel capacity assignments, window sizes for congestion control, and routing have on system performance.
Alexander Thomasian, Paul F. Bay
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2
1984 Analysis of an Integrated Queuing Model of a Computer Communication Network
Alexander Thomasian, Paul F. Bay
ICDCS2
1984 Performance Analysis of Window Flow Control for Multiple Virtual Routes
Alexander Thomasian, Paul F. Bay
INFOCOM2
1984 Analysis of Queueing Network Models with Population Size Constraints and Delayed Blocked Customers
abstract
Queueing Network Models - QNM's with population size constraints and delayed blocked customers occur due to MultiProgramming Level - MPL constraints in computer systems and window flow-control mechanisms in Computer Communication Networks - CCN's. The computational cost of existing algorithms is unacceptable for large numbers of chains and high population sizes. A fast approximate solution technique based on load concealment is presented to solve such QNM's. The solution procedure is non-iterative in the case of fixed rate Poisson arrivals, while iteration is required in the case of quasi-random arrivals. Each iteration requires the solution of a single chain network of queues comprised of stations visited by each chain. We then present an algorithm to detect saturated chains and determine their maximum throughput. A fast solution algorithm due to Reiser for closed chains is also extended to the case of quasi-random arrivals. The accuracy of the proposed solution techniques is compared to previous techniques by applying it to a test case, reported in the literature, and a set of randomly generated examples.
Alexander Thomasian, Paul F. Bay
SIGMETRICS2
1983 Queueing Network Models for Parallel Processing of Task Systems
Alexander Thomasian, Paul F. Bay
ICPP2