Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Robert Scheichl
dblp:33/5956
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0001-8493-4393ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 53% Optimization for machine learning · 27% Deep learning architectures and training · 20% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
density estimation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | HINT: Hierarchical Invertible Neural Transport for Density Estimation and Bayesian Inference · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
invertible neural network |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | HINT: Hierarchical Invertible Neural Transport for Density Estimation and Bayesian Inference · AAAI 2021 |
Electronic design automation
uncertainty quantification |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | High performance uncertainty quantification with parallelized multilevel Markov chain Monte Carlo · SC 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › second-order optimization
newton method |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Stein variational Newton method · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
second-order optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Stein variational Newton method · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference › particle-based variational inference
stein variational gradient descent |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Stein variational Newton method · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Stein variational Newton method · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | HINT: Hierarchical Invertible Neural Transport for Density Estimation and Bayesian Inference · AAAI 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
normalizing flow · 0.5multi-level monte carlo · 0.5markov chain monte carlo · 0.5invertible neural network · 0.5hierarchical coupling · 0.5reproducing kernel hilbert space · 0.3kullback-leibler divergence · 0.3functional gradient descent · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | HINT: Hierarchical Invertible Neural Transport for Density Estimation and Bayesian InferenceabstractMany recent invertible neural architectures are based on coupling block designs where variables are divided in two subsets which serve as inputs of an easily invertible (usually affine) triangular transformation. While such a transformation is invertible, its Jacobian is very sparse and thus may lack expressiveness. This work presents a simple remedy by noting that subdivision and (affine) coupling can be repeated recursively within the resulting subsets, leading to an efficiently invertible block with dense, triangular Jacobian. By formulating our recursive coupling scheme via a hierarchical architecture, HINT allows sampling from a joint distribution p(y,x) and the corresponding posterior p(x|y) using a single invertible network. We evaluate our method on some standard data sets and benchmark its full power for density estimation and Bayesian inference on a novel data set of 2D shapes in Fourier parameterization, which enables consistent visualization of samples for different dimensionalities. Jakob Kruse, Gianluca Detommaso, Ullrich Köthe, Robert Scheichl |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2021 | High performance uncertainty quantification with parallelized multilevel Markov chain Monte CarloabstractNumerical models of complex real-world phenomena often necessitate High Performance Computing (HPC). Uncertainties increase problem dimensionality further and pose even greater challenges. Linus Seelinger, Anne Reinarz, Leonhard Rannabauer, Michael Bader, Peter Bastian, Robert Scheichl |
SC | 6 |
| 2018 | A Stein variational Newton methodabstractStein variational gradient descent (SVGD) was recently proposed as a general purpose nonparametric variational inference algorithm: it minimizes the Kullback–Leibler divergence between the target distribution and its approximation by implementing a form of functional gradient descent on a reproducing kernel Hilbert space [Liu & Wang, NIPS 2016]. In this paper, we accelerate and generalize the SVGD algorithm by including second-order information, thereby approximating a Newton-like iteration in function space. We also show how second-order information can lead to more effective choices of kernel. We observe significant computational gains over the original SVGD algorithm in multiple test cases. Gianluca Detommaso, Tiangang Cui, Youssef Marzouk 0001, Alessio Spantini, Robert Scheichl |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2015 | Petascale solvers for anisotropic PDEs in atmospheric modelling on GPU clusters
Eike Hermann Müller, Robert Scheichl, Eero Vainikko |
Parallel Comput. | 2 |