Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sobhan Naderi Parizi
dblp:33/6765
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 60% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 29% Image recognition and object detection · 11% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › non-convex optimization
majorization-minimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Generalized Majorization-Minimization · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Generalized Majorization-Minimization · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.3 | 2 | 2019 | Reconfigurable models for scene recognition · CVPR 2012 Generalized Majorization-Minimization · ICML 2019 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
scene recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Reconfigurable models for scene recognition · CVPR 2012 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
parameter estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Generalized Majorization-Minimization · ICML 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
majorization-minimization · 0.4bound optimization · 0.4latent structural SVM · 0.1expectation-maximization · 0.1bag-of-words · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Generalized Majorization-MinimizationabstractNon-convex optimization is ubiquitous in machine learning. Majorization-Minimization (MM) is a powerful iterative procedure for optimizing non-convex functions that works by optimizing a sequence of bounds on the function. In MM, the bound at each iteration is required to touch the objective function at the optimizer of the previous bound. We show that this touching constraint is unnecessary and overly restrictive. We generalize MM by relaxing this constraint, and propose a new optimization framework, named Generalized Majorization-Minimization (G-MM), that is more flexible. For instance, G-MM can incorporate application-specific biases into the optimization procedure without changing the objective function. We derive G-MM algorithms for several latent variable models and show empirically that they consistently outperform their MM counterparts in optimizing non-convex objectives. In particular, G-MM algorithms appear to be less sensitive to initialization. Sobhan Naderi Parizi, Kun He 0003, Reza Aghajani, Stan Sclaroff, Pedro F. Felzenszwalb |
ICML | 1 |
| 2015 | Spotlight the Negatives: A Generalized Discriminative Latent ModelabstractDiscriminative latent variable models (LVM) are frequently applied to various visual recognition tasks. In these systems the latent (hidden) variables provide a formalism for modeling structured variation of visual features. Conventionally, latent variables are de- fined on the variation of the foreground (positive) class. In this work we augment LVMs to include negative latent variables corresponding to the background class. We formalize the scoring function of such a generalized LVM (GLVM). Then we discuss a framework for learning a model based on the GLVM scoring function. We theoretically showcase how some of the current visual recognition methods can benefit from this generalization. Finally, we experiment on a generalized form of Deformable Part Models with negative latent variables and show significant improvements on two different detection tasks. Hossein Azizpour, Mostafa Arefiyan, Sobhan Naderi Parizi, Stefan Carlsson |
BMVC | 3 |
| 2012 | Reconfigurable models for scene recognitionabstractWe propose a new latent variable model for scene recognition. Our approach represents a scene as a collection of region models (“parts”) arranged in a reconfigurable pattern. We partition an image into a predefined set of regions and use a latent variable to specify which region model is assigned to each image region. In our current implementation we use a bag of words representation to capture the appearance of an image region. The resulting method generalizes a spatial bag of words approach that relies on a fixed model for the bag of words in each image region. Our models can be trained using both generative and discriminative methods. In the generative setting we use the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm to estimate model parameters from a collection of images with category labels. In the discriminative setting we use a latent structural SVM (LSSVM). We note that LSSVMs can be very sensitive to initialization and demonstrate that generative training with EM provides a good initialization for discriminative training with LSSVM. Sobhan Naderi Parizi, John G. Oberlin, Pedro F. Felzenszwalb |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2010 | Improving bag-of-features action recognition with non-local cuesabstractLocal space-time features have recently shown promising results within Bag-of-Features (BoF) approach to action recognition in video. Pure local features and descriptors, however, provide only limited discriminative power implying ambiguity among features and sub-optimal classification performance. In this work, we propose to disambiguate local space-time features and to improve action recognition by integrating additional nonlocal cues with BoF representation. For this purpose, we decompose video into region classes and augment local features with corresponding region-class labels. In particular, we investigate unsupervised and supervised video segmentation using (i) motion-based foreground segmentation, (ii) person detection, (iii) static action detection and (iv) object detection. While such segmentation methods might be imperfect, they provide complementary region-level information to local features. We demonstrate how this information can be integrated with BoF representations in a kernel-combination framework. We evaluate our method on the recent and challenging Hollywood-2 action dataset and demonstrate significant improvements. Muhammad Muneeb Ullah, Sobhan Naderi Parizi, Ivan Laptev |
BMVC | 2 |