Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

John Jardine

dblp:33/6877 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 77% Cloud and datacenter computing · 12% Electronic design automation · 12%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › concurrency control
livelock prevention
0.012001
Livelock Avoidance for Meta-Schedulers · HPDC 2001
Distributed systems › distributed scheduling
meta-scheduling
0.012001
Livelock Avoidance for Meta-Schedulers · HPDC 2001
Cloud and datacenter computing
resource management
0.012001
Livelock Avoidance for Meta-Schedulers · HPDC 2001
Electronic design automation › high-level synthesis
scheduling
0.012001
Livelock Avoidance for Meta-Schedulers · HPDC 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

meta-scheduling · 0.0exponential back-off · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 Livelock Avoidance for Meta-Schedulers
abstract
Meta-scheduling, a process which allows a user to schedule a job across multiple sites, has a potential for livelock. Current systems avoid livelock by locking down resources at multiple sites and allowing a meta-scheduler to control the resources during the lock down period or by limiting job size to that which will fit on one site. The former approach leads to poor utilization; the later poses limitations on job size. This research uses BYU's Meta-scheduler (YMS) which allows jobs to be scheduled across multiple sites without the need for locking down the nodes. YMS avoids livelock through exponential back-off. This research quantifies the potential for livelock, determines a suitable back-off period, and provides a structure upon which to test theoretical local schedulers. The results show that livelock exists and that a suitable exponential back-off not only avoids livelock but reduces the scheduling time for each job.
John Jardine, Quinn Snell, Mark J. Clement
HPDC1