Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dennis J. Hazelett

dblp:33/7064 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-0749-9935ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biomedical knowledge discovery
disease mechanism inference
0.912025
Rethinking GWAS: how lessons from genetic screens and artificial intelligence could reveal biological mechanisms · Bioinform. 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genome-wide association study
0.912025
Rethinking GWAS: how lessons from genetic screens and artificial intelligence could reveal biological mechanisms · Bioinform. 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › post-GWAS analysis
genome-wide association study interpretation
0.912025
Rethinking GWAS: how lessons from genetic screens and artificial intelligence could reveal biological mechanisms · Bioinform. 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology › network inference
gene regulatory network inference
0.412019
ELMER v.2: an R/Bioconductor package to reconstruct gene regulatory networks from DNA methylation and transcriptome profiles · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
variant effect prediction
0.212015
motifbreakR: an R/Bioconductor package for predicting variant effects at transcription factor binding sites · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics › DNA methylation
DNA methylation analysis
0.112019
ELMER v.2: an R/Bioconductor package to reconstruct gene regulatory networks from DNA methylation and transcriptome profiles · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular property prediction
binding affinity prediction
0.112009
Affinity Density: a novel genomic approach to the identification of transcription factor regulatory targets · Bioinform. 2009
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
gene regulation analysis
0.112009
Affinity Density: a novel genomic approach to the identification of transcription factor regulatory targets · Bioinform. 2009
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation › transcription factor analysis
transcription factor target identification
0.112009
Affinity Density: a novel genomic approach to the identification of transcription factor regulatory targets · Bioinform. 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

single-cell omics · 0.9artificial intelligence · 0.9supervised analysis · 0.4statistical modeling · 0.4motif scanning · 0.2signal processing · 0.1hann digital filter · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Rethinking GWAS: how lessons from genetic screens and artificial intelligence could reveal biological mechanisms
abstract
MOTIVATION: Modern single-cell omics data are key to unraveling the complex mechanisms underlying risk for complex diseases revealed by genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Phenotypic screens in model organisms have several important parallels to GWAS which the author explores in this essay. RESULTS: The author provides the historical context of such screens, comparing and contrasting similarities to association studies, and how these screens in model organisms can teach us what to look for. Then the author considers how the results of GWAS might be exhaustively interrogated to interpret the biological mechanisms underpinning disease processes. Finally, the author proposes a general framework for tackling this problem computationally, and explore the data, mechanisms, and technology (both existing and yet to be invented) that are necessary to complete the task. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: There are no data or code associated with this article.
Dennis J. Hazelett
Bioinform.1
2019 ELMER v.2: an R/Bioconductor package to reconstruct gene regulatory networks from DNA methylation and transcriptome profiles
abstract
MOTIVATION: DNA methylation has been used to identify functional changes at transcriptional enhancers and other cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) in tumors and other disease tissues. Our R/Bioconductor package ELMER (Enhancer Linking by Methylation/Expression Relationships) provides a systematic approach that reconstructs altered gene regulatory networks (GRNs) by combining enhancer methylation and gene expression data derived from the same sample set. RESULTS: We present a completely revised version 2 of ELMER that provides numerous new features including an optional web-based interface and a new Supervised Analysis mode to use pre-defined sample groupings. We show that Supervised mode significantly increases statistical power and identifies additional GRNs and associated Master Regulators, such as SOX11 and KLF5 in Basal-like breast cancer. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: ELMER v.2 is available as an R/Bioconductor package at http://bioconductor.org/packages/ELMER/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Tiago Chedraoui Silva, Simon G. Coetzee, Nicole Gull, Lijing Yao, Dennis J. Hazelett, Houtan Noushmehr, De-Chen Lin, Benjamin P. Berman
Bioinform.5
2015 motifbreakR: an R/Bioconductor package for predicting variant effects at transcription factor binding sites
abstract
UNLABELLED: Functional annotation represents a key step toward the understanding and interpretation of germline and somatic variation as revealed by genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), respectively. GWAS have revealed numerous genetic risk variants residing in non-coding DNA associated with complex diseases. For sequences that lie within enhancers or promoters of transcription, it is not straightforward to assess the effects of variants on likely transcription factor binding sites. Consequently we introduce motifbreakR, which allows the biologist to judge whether the sequence surrounding a polymorphism or mutation is a good match, and how much information is gained or lost in one allele of the polymorphism or mutation relative to the other. MotifbreakR is flexible, giving a choice of algorithms for interrogation of genomes with motifs from many public sources that users can choose from. MotifbreakR can predict effects for novel or previously described variants in public databases, making it suitable for tasks beyond the scope of its original design. Lastly, it can be used to interrogate any genome curated within bioconductor. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/Simon-Coetzee/MotifBreakR, www.bioconductor.org. CONTACT: [email protected].
Simon G. Coetzee, Gerhard A. Coetzee, Dennis J. Hazelett
Bioinform.3
2009 Affinity Density: a novel genomic approach to the identification of transcription factor regulatory targets
abstract
METHODS: A new method was developed for identifying novel transcription factor regulatory targets based on calculating Local Affinity Density. Techniques from the signal-processing field were used, in particular the Hann digital filter, to calculate the relative binding affinity of different regions based on previously published in vitro binding data. To illustrate this approach, the complete genomes of Drosophila melanogaster and D.pseudoobscura were analyzed for binding sites of the homeodomain proteinc Tinman, an essential heart development gene in both Drosophila and Mouse. The significant binding regions were identified relative to genomic background and assigned to putative target genes. Valid candidates common to both species of Drosophila were selected as a test of conservation. RESULTS: The new method was more sensitive than cluster searches for conserved binding motifs with respect to positive identification of known Tinman targets. Our Local Affinity Density method also identified a significantly greater proportion of Tinman-coexpressed genes than equivalent, optimized cluster searching. In addition, this new method predicted a significantly greater than expected number of genes with previously published RNAi phenotypes in the heart. AVAILABILITY: Algorithms were implemented in Python, LISP, R and maxima, using MySQL to access locally mirrored sequence data from Ensembl (D.melanogaster release 4.3) and flybase (D.pseudoobscura). All code is licensed under GPL and freely available at http://www.ohsu.edu/cellbio/dev_biol_prog/affinitydensity/.
Dennis J. Hazelett, Daniel L. Lakeland, Joseph B. Weiss
Bioinform.1