Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jaedeug Choi

dblp:33/7441 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 6 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Reinforcement learning · 61% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 31% Representation and self-supervised learning · 9%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
inverse reinforcement learning
0.752013
Bayesian Nonparametric Feature Construction for Inverse Reinforcement Learning · IJCAI 2013
Nonparametric Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Multiple Reward Functions · NIPS 2012
Inverse Reinforcement Learning in Partially Observable Environments · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model
0.322013
Bayesian Nonparametric Feature Construction for Inverse Reinforcement Learning · IJCAI 2013
Nonparametric Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Multiple Reward Functions · NIPS 2012
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning › inverse reinforcement learning
bayesian inverse reinforcement learning
0.322012
Nonparametric Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Multiple Reward Functions · NIPS 2012
MAP Inference for Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning · NIPS 2011
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
partially observable reinforcement learning
0.222011
Inverse Reinforcement Learning in Partially Observable Environments · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011
Inverse Reinforcement Learning in Partially Observable Environments · IJCAI 2009
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › feature transformation
feature construction
0.212013
Bayesian Nonparametric Feature Construction for Inverse Reinforcement Learning · IJCAI 2013
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian nonparametric model
dirichlet process mixture model
0.112012
Nonparametric Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Multiple Reward Functions · NIPS 2012
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
MAP inference
0.112011
MAP Inference for Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning · NIPS 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

inverse reinforcement learning · 0.2bayesian nonparametric model · 0.2metropolis-hastings sampling · 0.1dirichlet process mixture model · 0.1partially observable environments · 0.1maximum a posteriori estimation · 0.1gradient methods · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Hierarchical Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) is the problem of inferring the underlying reward function from the expert's behavior data. The difficulty in IRL mainly arises in choosing the best reward function since there are typically an infinite number of reward functions that yield the given behavior data as optimal. Another difficulty comes from the noisy behavior data due to sub-optimal experts. We propose a hierarchical Bayesian framework, which subsumes most of the previous IRL algorithms as well as models the sub-optimality of the expert's behavior. Using a number of experiments on a synthetic problem, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach including the robustness of our hierarchical Bayesian framework to the sub-optimal expert behavior data. Using a real dataset from taxi GPS traces, we additionally show that our approach predicts the driving behavior with a high accuracy.
Jaedeug Choi, Kee-Eung Kim
IEEE Trans. Cybern.1
2013 Bayesian Nonparametric Feature Construction for Inverse Reinforcement Learning
Jaedeug Choi, Kee-Eung Kim
IJCAI1
2013 Engineering Statistical Dialog State Trackers: A Case Study on DSTC
Daejoong Kim, Jaedeug Choi, Kee-Eung Kim, Jungsu Lee, Jinho Sohn
SIGDIAL Conference2
2012 Nonparametric Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Multiple Reward Functions
abstract
We present a nonparametric Bayesian approach to inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) for multiple reward functions. Most previous IRL algorithms assume that the behaviour data is obtained from an agent who is optimizing a single reward function, but this assumption is hard to be met in practice. Our approach is based on integrating the Dirichlet process mixture model into Bayesian IRL. We provide an efficient Metropolis-Hastings sampling algorithm utilizing the gradient of the posterior to estimate the underlying reward functions, and demonstrate that our approach outperforms the previous ones via experiments on a number of problem domains.
Jaedeug Choi, Kee-Eung Kim
NIPS1
2011 MAP Inference for Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning
abstract
The difficulty in inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) arises in choosing the best reward function since there are typically an infinite number of reward functions that yield the given behaviour data as optimal. Using a Bayesian framework, we address this challenge by using the maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation for the reward function, and show that most of the previous IRL algorithms can be modeled into our framework. We also present a gradient method for the MAP estimation based on the (sub)differentiability of the posterior distribution. We show the effectiveness of our approach by comparing the performance of the proposed method to those of the previous algorithms.
Jaedeug Choi, Kee-Eung Kim
NIPS1
2011 Inverse Reinforcement Learning in Partially Observable Environments
Jaedeug Choi, Kee-Eung Kim
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2009 Inverse Reinforcement Learning in Partially Observable Environments
Jaedeug Choi, Kee-Eung Kim
IJCAI1