Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David Ben-David

dblp:33/8883 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data stream processing · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data stream processing › stream monitoring
distributed stream monitoring
0.212014
Geometric Monitoring of Heterogeneous Streams · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimization · 0.4hierarchical clustering · 0.4geometric monitoring · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Geometric Monitoring of Heterogeneous Streams
abstract
Interest in stream monitoring is shifting toward the distributed case. In many applications the data is high volume, dynamic, and distributed, making it infeasible to collect the distinct streams to a central node for processing. Often, the monitoring problem consists of determining whether the value of a global function, defined on the union of all streams, crossed a certain threshold. We wish to reduce communication by transforming the global monitoring to the testing of local constraints, checked independently at the nodes. Geometric monitoring (GM) proved useful for constructing such local constraints for general functions. Alas, in GM the constraints at all nodes share an identical structure and are thus unsuitable for handling heterogeneous streams. Therefore, we propose a general approach for monitoring heterogeneous streams (HGM), which defines constraints tailored to fit the data distributions at the nodes. While we prove that optimally selecting the constraints is NP-hard, we provide a practical solution, which reduces the running time by hierarchically clustering nodes with similar data distributions and then solving simpler optimization problems. We also present a method for efficiently recovering from local violations at the nodes. Experiments yield an improvement of over an order of magnitude in communication relative to GM.
Daniel Keren, Guy Sagy, Amir Abboud, David Ben-David, Assaf Schuster, Izchak Sharfman, Antonios Deligiannakis
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.4
2010 Enterprise Data Classification Using Semantic Web Technologies
David Ben-David, Tamar Domany, Abigail Tarem
ISWC (2)1