Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Scott Geng
dblp:330/4056
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 28% Generative modeling · 26% Deep learning architectures and training · 16% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Program analysis · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Systems and software security · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
equivariant neural network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Exploiting Code Symmetries for Learning Program Semantics · ICML 2024 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | The Unmet Promise of Synthetic Training Images: Using Retrieved Real Images Performs Better · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
synthetic training data |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | The Unmet Promise of Synthetic Training Images: Using Retrieved Real Images Performs Better · NeurIPS 2024 |
Program analysis
code representation learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Exploiting Code Symmetries for Learning Program Semantics · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Understanding Zero-shot Adversarial Robustness for Large-Scale Models · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness › adversarially robust generalization
zero-shot adversarial robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Understanding Zero-shot Adversarial Robustness for Large-Scale Models · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
zero-shot transfer |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Understanding Zero-shot Adversarial Robustness for Large-Scale Models · ICLR 2023 |
Systems and software security
binary analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | NeuDep: neural binary memory dependence analysis · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › synthetic data generation
synthetic image generation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | The Unmet Promise of Synthetic Training Images: Using Retrieved Real Images Performs Better · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | The Unmet Promise of Synthetic Training Images: Using Retrieved Real Images Performs Better · NeurIPS 2024 |
Program analysis
binary analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | NeuDep: neural binary memory dependence analysis · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2022 |
Program analysis
static analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | NeuDep: neural binary memory dependence analysis · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-attention · 1.5large language model · 1.5group theory · 1.5neural network · 1.1deep learning · 1.1fine-tuning · 0.8adversarial evaluation · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Exploiting Code Symmetries for Learning Program SemanticsabstractThis paper tackles the challenge of teaching code semantics to Large Language Models (LLMs) for program analysis by incorporating code symmetries into the model architecture. We introduce a group-theoretic framework that defines code symmetries as semantics-preserving transformations, where forming a code symmetry group enables precise and efficient reasoning of code semantics. Our solution, SymC, develops a novel variant of self-attention that is provably equivariant to code symmetries from the permutation group defined over the program dependence graph. SymC obtains superior performance on five program analysis tasks, outperforming state-of-the-art code models, including GPT-4, without any pre-training. Our results suggest that code LLMs that encode the code structural prior via the code symmetry group generalize better and faster. Kexin Pei, Weichen Li 0001, Qirui Jin, Scott Geng, Lorenzo Cavallaro, Suman Jana |
ICML | 5 |
| 2024 | The Unmet Promise of Synthetic Training Images: Using Retrieved Real Images Performs BetterabstractGenerative text-to-image models enable us to synthesize unlimited amounts of images in a controllable manner, spurring many recent efforts to train vision models with synthetic data. However, every synthetic image ultimately originates from the upstream data used to train the generator. Does the intermediate generator provide additional information over directly training on relevant parts of the upstream data?
Grounding this question in the setting of image classification, we compare finetuning on task-relevant, targeted synthetic data generated by Stable Diffusion---a generative model trained on the LAION-2B dataset---against finetuning on targeted real images retrieved directly from LAION-2B. We show that while synthetic data can benefit some downstream tasks, it is universally matched or outperformed by real data from the simple retrieval baseline. Our analysis suggests that this underperformance is partially due to generator artifacts and inaccurate task-relevant visual details in the synthetic images. Overall, we argue that targeted retrieval is a critical baseline to consider when training with synthetic data---a baseline that current methods do not yet surpass. We release code, data, and models at [https://github.com/scottgeng00/unmet-promise/](https://github.com/scottgeng00/unmet-promise). Scott Geng, Cheng-Yu Hsieh, Vivek Ramanujan, Matthew Wallingford, Chun-Liang Li, Pang Wei Koh, Ranjay Krishna |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Understanding Zero-shot Adversarial Robustness for Large-Scale Models
Chengzhi Mao, Scott Geng, Xin Wang 0066, Carl Vondrick |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2022 | NeuDep: neural binary memory dependence analysisabstractDetermining whether multiple instructions can access the same memory location is a critical task in binary analysis. It is challenging as statically computing precise alias information is undecidable in theory. The problem aggravates at the binary level due to the presence of compiler optimizations and the absence of symbols and types. Existing approaches either produce significant spurious dependencies due to conservative analysis or scale poorly to complex binaries. Kexin Pei, Dongdong She, Scott Geng, Zhou Xuan, Yaniv David, Suman Jana, Baishakhi Ray |
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE | 4 |